No matter if you know or ignore the film is still nothing half and nothing whole.
He has a nice carefree way, but he is optically so mediocre and meaningless that nothing will remain in the memory.
The character design is a bit too Catholic, the textures are too weak, the animation itself is a bit too slapstick for my taste. This is one of the few martial arts films that clearly differentiate between martial arts and acrobatics. And you couldn't quite decide whether to give the animals realistic or abstract colors. I liked the film but it is not worth looking at again. Small children will have fun with it but only recommended if there is really nothing better to find there is a good gap filler. This is truly a children's film through and through because it is more of a content and narrative style for children and because children do not yet have the cognitive skills to follow abstract thinking processes or complex actions and they are fed with shallow food anyway before being served a lobster. besides, the film has almost no extras almost every scene and setting feels really empty I really thought in the beginning the main character lives in a ghost town
But here are a few things the film did well: 1. The film is entertaining, 2. The film is not silly 3. The film knows when to be funny 4. The film knows when to be serious 5. All battles are as fast as they are dynamic 6. Although the main villain in this film is very passive, you have given a lot of personality through his fighting style and presented it as a serious threat 7. the last fight is surprisingly exciting and surprisingly hard compared to the rest of the film, which is why the win feels all the sweeter
He has a nice carefree way, but he is optically so mediocre and meaningless that nothing will remain in the memory.
The character design is a bit too Catholic, the textures are too weak, the animation itself is a bit too slapstick for my taste. This is one of the few martial arts films that clearly differentiate between martial arts and acrobatics. And you couldn't quite decide whether to give the animals realistic or abstract colors. I liked the film but it is not worth looking at again. Small children will have fun with it but only recommended if there is really nothing better to find there is a good gap filler. This is truly a children's film through and through because it is more of a content and narrative style for children and because children do not yet have the cognitive skills to follow abstract thinking processes or complex actions and they are fed with shallow food anyway before being served a lobster. besides, the film has almost no extras almost every scene and setting feels really empty I really thought in the beginning the main character lives in a ghost town
But here are a few things the film did well: 1. The film is entertaining, 2. The film is not silly 3. The film knows when to be funny 4. The film knows when to be serious 5. All battles are as fast as they are dynamic 6. Although the main villain in this film is very passive, you have given a lot of personality through his fighting style and presented it as a serious threat 7. the last fight is surprisingly exciting and surprisingly hard compared to the rest of the film, which is why the win feels all the sweeter