Review of 3022

3022 (2019)
6/10
Slow moving Sunshine extremely light
24 November 2020
Warning: Spoilers
In Short Low to mid buget movie that lends from 2 other movies mainly; Sunshine (2007) and Event Horizon (1997). Due to the budget the CGI isn't aced and neither is the staging always good. The writing is allright thought with alot of logical misses and scientific inaccuracies. This movie does not try to function within established scientific borders. The acting is what you will remember this for, the full cast makes well above ancticipated performances and Omar Epps delivers a pretty much aced performance. The smoking advertising is disturbing though, possibly the only way to finance the movie - act and give others cancer or not to act, that is the question..?

Pro's Acting Alot of bang for the buck Some effect - the space station cgi

Con's Smoking in space Huge logical gaps Detracting staging and cgi at times

To clear out the name: At one point he mentions the 3022 - it is the time spent on the station at that point in time 3022 days - this plays in in keeping the viewer guessing if what you are shown is his disillusions, if the whole thing is the scientific test they are there for or if it is their reality.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed