5/10
Overall a disappointment
13 March 2022
Watching the series was as entertaining as leafing through a gossip magazine in a dentist's office. It's something to do to pass the time, and once in a while you spot something intriguing, but most of the time you're rolling your eyes and checking the clock.

Shonda Rhimes' primary error was deconstructing a genuinely engaging story and replacing it with "completely true, except for totally made up" patchwork. Her characters often behave illogically and lack motivation because the events that led to their real-life decisions are misrepresented or omitted altogether.

The creation and depiction of "Vivian" is particularly irritating and unnecessary. Vivian's behavior was unrealistically unprofessional (particularly when interacting with her managers), her communication skills were terrible, and she appeared to be a rookie journalist rather than a seasoned reporter. Anna Chlumsky's insistence on an endless series of exaggerated facial expressions was a constant reminder that Vivian was an invention herself, because no one that incompetent could have successfully wrested an interview from "the" Anna. The show would have been much better if it simply described IRL reporter Jessica's work and relationship with Anna.

When the series ends, you still won't understand how and why the elite New Yorkers fell for the long con. If you have a spark of curiosity remaining, check out the Vanity Fair article by the "real" Rachel (and ponder over Rachel's likely reaction to how she is portrayed by Rhimes).
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed