Seems like other reviewers plagiarized one another without forming their own opinions.
Acting - is so-so. Not good, but good enough.
Story - some reviewers complained about the story or plot, but it's around the same quality as the original.
Smart zombie- another reviewer complained about the zombies being too smart. Well none of the zombies were smart. There was one character who LOOKED like a zombie, but wasn't. He was partially immune to the zombie virus and had certain systems of his body succumb to the virus, while retaining some higher level brain function.
All in all, it's not that good, but not nearly as bad as what other reviewers are claiming. I can see why someone might give it a 4 or 5 if they we're expecting Dawn of the Dead or 28 Days Later. But a 1 - 3 is certainly out of the question.
Acting - is so-so. Not good, but good enough.
Story - some reviewers complained about the story or plot, but it's around the same quality as the original.
Smart zombie- another reviewer complained about the zombies being too smart. Well none of the zombies were smart. There was one character who LOOKED like a zombie, but wasn't. He was partially immune to the zombie virus and had certain systems of his body succumb to the virus, while retaining some higher level brain function.
All in all, it's not that good, but not nearly as bad as what other reviewers are claiming. I can see why someone might give it a 4 or 5 if they we're expecting Dawn of the Dead or 28 Days Later. But a 1 - 3 is certainly out of the question.