I was looking forward to this movie due to it being rooted in a real story, but quite early on was confronted by how the writer / director / production crew apparently thought it was acceptable to normalise scientific fraud. Now I know this is popular culture right now with the multi decade long brainwashing about catastrophic man climate change, and it is de rigueur by activists to constuct artificial facts as 'the end justifies the means', but: unacceptable in a movie based on real events.
There is hardly a person alive that does not value nature and the protection of endangered species but to normalise fraud eg the hamster incident is a slap in the face of the principles of the enlightenment. End of story.
There is hardly a person alive that does not value nature and the protection of endangered species but to normalise fraud eg the hamster incident is a slap in the face of the principles of the enlightenment. End of story.