The Divorce of Lady X (1938) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
39 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
A Slight, Charming Comedy From a Different Age
theowinthrop15 May 2006
Lawrence Olivier and Merle Oberon did two movies together within two years. One is considered one of the great romantic films of all time, and the movie that made Olivier a great movie star (and gave Oberon her best performance role): WUTHERING HEIGHTS. The other is this film, made in England a year earlier. THE DIVORCE OF LADY X is a romantic comedy (as WUTHERING HEIGHTS is a romantic tragedy). Olivier is a lawyer, Everard Logan, who is a dynamic barrister, but is also a total misogynist. One night he checks into a hotel just ahead of a crowd of people. It is a very foggy night (the type of pea soup fog that London was known for up until a notorious "killer" fog in the 1950s), and the crowd (who'd been attending a party in the hotel) need beds. The management tries to get Logan to allow one or two socialite ladies to sleep on a couch and a day bed in his rooms, but he refuses. But he has not reckoned with Merle Oberon as Leslie Steele. The granddaughter of a high court judge, she manages to get into Logan's rooms and manipulates him to not only agree to her sleeping there, but appropriates his bed (he goes onto the couch - much to his discomfort).

The next day they share a breakfast, and in the smalltalk it is evident that despite his mistrust of women Logan finds Leslie very attractive. But she kittenishly refuses to tell him her name. She is determined to learn more about him, and she finds his attitude toward women infuriating. In the meantime, Logan is approached by a wealthy nobleman (Ralph Richardson as Lord Mere) as a potential client. Mere suspects his wife Lady Mere (Binnie Barnes) of having an affair. In fact, he tells Logan her Ladyship was with her lover in the hotel that Logan knows he was in on the night of the fog. Logan (naturally) jumps to the conclusion that Lady Mere was his mysterious roommate that night. I will not go into the plot any further, except to say that Leslie eventually realizes what a mistake Logan has made, and decides to use it to teach him a lesson about women.

The script has the feel of a Wodehouse novel, but is slighter. Still the performances of Olivier, Oberon, Richardson, Barnes, and Morton Selden (as Oberon's grandfather) are all splendid. It shows what a good cast can do with even the slightest of materials. Take a look at some of the minor scenes to see what I mean: Selden's first scene, complaining about his weak coffee to his butler/valet, who tells him off properly (they've been used to each other's personalities for years). Or Olivier dealing with a young clerk in his office, who is certain there were two Lady Meres in the office two minutes before (there were, but Oberon and Barnes left together), and ends up thinking the poor clerk is a simpleton. Or the waiter in the hotel who can't understand why the tenant in Olivier's room is constantly changing from a man to a woman to a man. As I said, a slight charming comedy - but it is very charming.
39 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Mistaken identity British comedy
blanche-228 August 2009
Laurence Olivier, Merle Oberon, Ralph Richardson, and Binnie Barnes star in "The Divorce of Lady X," a 1938 comedy based on a play. Olivier plays a young barrister, Everard Logan who allows Oberon to spend the night in his hotel room, when the London fog is too dense for guests at a costume ball to go home. The next day, a friend of his, Lord Mere (Richardson), announces that his wife (Barnes) spent the night with another man at the same hotel, and he wants to divorce her. Believing the woman to be Oberon, Olivier panics. Oberon, who is single and the granddaughter of a judge, pretends that she's the lady in question, Lady Mere, when she's really Leslie Steele.

We've seen this plot or variations thereof dozens of time. With this cast, it's delightful. I mean, Richardson and Olivier? Olivier and Oberon, that great team in Wuthering Heights? Pretty special. Olivier is devastatingly handsome and does a great job with the comedy as he portrays the uptight, nervous barrister. Oberon gives her role the right light touch. She looks extremely young here, fuller in the face, with Jean Harlow eyebrows and a very different hairdo for her. She wears some beautiful street clothes, though her first gown looks like a birthday cake, and in one gown she tries on, with that hair-do, she's ready to play Snow White. Binnie Barnes is delightful as the real Lady Mere.

The color in this is a mess, and as others have mentioned, it could really use a restoration. Definitely worth seeing.
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Acting Lords
bkoganbing24 April 2005
Laurence Olivier and Ralph Richardson who went on to knighthood as they entered the primes of their respective career show a comic talent in this film which in America would have been done by Cary Grant or William Powell. Later on Rock Hudson, Doris Day, Tony Randall and/or Gig Young would have played some of those parts in this film. In America, Carole Lombard would have been in Merle Oberon's part at the time this was made.

Olivier is one tired divorce attorney who checks into a hotel one night for a little sack time. The hotel is booked to the gills, but Merle Oberson fresh from a party at the establishment also needs a place to sleep. She guiles and charms her way into his room and heart. But Olivier inadvertently mistakes who she is and that's where the fun begins.

Ralph Richardson and Binnie Barnes lend good support as a battling titled Lord and his much married wife. Morton Selten does a nice turn as Oberon's grandfather. He's best known for Fire Over England as Lord Burleigh and Thief of Bagdad as the wise old king that Sabu expropriates the flying carpet from. The beard he sported in those parts is gone here.

Olivier stated many times that he didn't think too much of his film performances before Wuthering Heights. He credited Wiliam Wyler for teaching him the art of cinema as opposed to stage acting. But even second rate Olivier is better than 90% of other players.
20 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Delightful british comedy!!
angel_de_tourvel1 August 2004
This short, unique and original screen-play proved no short of brilliant. It has a simple and entertaining plot of charming but mischevious young Leslie (known at first as Lady X) imposing herself on a foggy night on irritable young masoganistic barrister Everard Logan. Logan declares that he is not in the least bit stirred by her charms, however she finally ends up enjoying his bed, pyjamas and breakfast whilst he has the mattress next door. Ofcourse, being the eligible handsome typical thing that he is, he falls in love with her and vows to arrange her divorce for her, (despite the fact she has no husband!) Ralph Richardson as Lord Mere (Leslie's supposed husband) and Binnie Barnes (the REAL Lady Mere)also help to put him in the light at last. Hurt and irritated, Logan throws his affections for Leslie back in her face and leaves. She goes after him, and naturally, they agree to the marriage finally that Logan had always wanted, and Leslie finalises in curing Logan of his haughtily sexist views.

Some say Laurence Olivier is out of his depth in this sort of a film, since in no way is this Hamlet or Harry V or any great feat of literature such as Wuthering Heights, and in no way is he a born comedian. But he gives it unmatched gusto and IS HE SARCASTIC!! His scenes with Merle Oberon, who plays the sweet little charmer of a Leslie are delightful. Oberon is adorable and could not have been better as Leslie.

It's been said before that Oberon and Olivier had a wonderful chemistry on screen, just as well as Leigh did in fact; however it could be argued so. They were just as contrastingly wonderful in Wuthering Heights, a classic film which I adore.

If you're in the mood of a short but sweet comedy, you couldn't ask for better than this. Fantastic!
22 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Slight comedy of manners badly needs color restoration...
Doylenf5 November 2006
This DIVORCE OF LADY X is the sort of film about misunderstandings among the upper crust of society that American audiences usually associate with someone like Norman Krasna, who wrote so many romantic comedies where someone assumed a different identity to keep the mistaken identity theme afloat for the duration of the plot. If I hadn't known better, I would have suspected he had a hand in this screenplay.

Here we have an early comedy from the U.K., courtesy of Alexander Korda, making use of three strip Technicolor--very low-key color apparently, at least judging from the rather poor Public Domain prints I've seen.

LAURENCE OLIVIER plays a barrister whose disdain for women is on a level with Professor Henry Higgins--he tolerates them until he falls in love with them. The joke here is that he is mistaken about the identity of MERLE OBERON, who gets even with him after finding out how rudely he treats women, by pretending to be the wife of RALPH RICHARDSON. He's hoodwinked by her until the very end when she realizes they share a mutual attraction.

It's amusing to watch Olivier and Oberon tackle these lightweight roles only a year before joining forces again for WUTHERING HEIGHTS. He has some very scathing comments to make about the opposite sex and plays his role with gusto. She's a bit more restrained in her role but together they show the kind of chemistry they would also get to display in the William Wyler film the following year.

This would have been more watchable if the color wasn't so badly in need of restoration.

Summing up: Amusing comedy of manners among British aristocracy.

P.S. - This is an update on my review of the film. Saw it today in brightly restored Technicolor which at least adds to the film's entertainment value, though the script is the main trouble. But TCM featured it in pristine condition in color that was extremely washed out and primitive looking before. It's now seen to advantage and adds a great deal of interest to viewing it as it was originally intended.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better to be married to a brute than a bore.
mark.waltz10 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
It's a mass state of confusion for barrister Laurence Olivier when he is manipulated to share his hotel suite with the stranded Merle Oberon whom he later believes to be the wife in question when he takes on the divorce case by Ralph Richardson. Oberon, actually single and the only heir to her grandfather's estate, knows the truth but having fallen in love with him, keeps it secret while the real wife (Binnie Barnes) continues her own charade. It's a sex comedy without sex, and very funny and romantic.

A year before their classic pairing as Heathcliff and Cathy in "Wuthering Heighrs", Olivier and Oberon play totally different emotions, giving a British taste of screwball comedy. They share complete chemistry as they romp around innocently in pajamas, moving bedroom furniture yo his living room. Gorgeous in Technicolor, this takes two people known more for drama and gives them something fun to play with. The innuendo is there, but it remains classy the entire time.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Olivier shines in comic role
igm20 April 2000
I had really only been exposed to Olivier's dramatic performances, and those were mostly much later films than *Divorce*. In this film, he is disarmed of his pomp and overconfidence by sassy Merle Oberon, and plays the flustered divorce attorney with great charm.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Decent but I can't but help think it couldn't have been a bit better considering the premise.
planktonrules25 September 2013
"The Divorce of Lady X" is a lovely color film produced by Alexander Korda--a man who had a great history producing films in the UK and US. However, compared to many of Korda's other great films, this one comes up a bit average. It has a great idea but something about it kept it from being a bit better.

The film begins in a horrible London fog. It's so foggy that folks can't get home and a hotel is totally booked. The last person to get a room, Everard (Laurence Olivier), is dead tired and miffed when the management asks him to share his suite since there are so many looking for rooms. Despite this, a very pushy and determined woman, Leslie (Merle Oberon), is able to finagle a bed in his room--and here is complications arise. He thinks she's a married woman and the next day, a man comes to hire him (as he's a barrister--that's a lawyer to us Americans) to sue his wife for divorce--and the woman the new client describes sounds EXACTLY like the woman who just spent the night with him! What's he to do? He's initially afraid that he's about to be named a co-respondent but later it's more complicated when he thinks that he's falling in love with this woman--a woman he thinks has been married four times already!

I nearly gave the movie a 7, so I did like it. However, sometimes I really thought they made Oberon's character too obnoxious and unlikable. Additionally, why Olivier's character would want to marry her is perplexing considering she's so obnoxious, manipulative AND he thinks she's been married many times already. Add to this a ridiculous courtroom scene at the very end, it just kept me wishing they'd edited or re-written the thing a bit.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Olivier?...Comic timing?...YES
seanhmoss620 March 2020
This was the first movie to be watched in my project to discover more about the career of Sir Laurence Olivier. I've seen many of his films. However after watching an interview with Dick Cavett, I've become more fascinated. I just started piling Olivier movies on to my watchlist on Amazon. Everyone knows Olivier's Shakespeare...but to see him in a romantic comedy? Never thought it existed. He, along with the entire cast, nailed it. The story, script, and direction are wonderful. Merle Oberon is an impish, mischievous delight, more than holding her own across from the man who is synonymous with the word Actor. Watch it by all means!
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Wanna see how women get away with everything? Try this fun little film
nomoons1123 June 2012
Warning: Spoilers
You very rarely get to see Laurence Olivier do comedy but in this he does his very best. Merle Oberon is the star of this for sure but the real star of this film is the story, and the chaos of it.

With this fun little English gem you'll get a comedy of errors. You know the kind. The one where all each character has to do is ask 1 basic question and the whole confusion would be solved. Not in this one. Without the question, we get keystone cops of a romantic nature.

The simple idea is that a heavy fog rolls into London and everyone has to find a place to stay for the night. Olivier stops and finds a room at a hotel where a Victorian themed ball is going on. These attendees find out too late to get a room at the hotel...except ms. Oberon. She finagles her way into Olivier's room and from this, chaos comes soon after. A fun kinda chaos.

Watch this and see what a girl can do to a guy just by batting her eyelashes and using her "feminine wiles" to get what she wants....in a real cute way. See why no man in the world has a chance against a beautiful and charming woman. For any guy out there, see this and you'll wanna be Olivier. You'll wanna be charmed by Merle Oberon.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Cinematic antique notable for on-screen talent rather than plot development.
Pedro_H7 March 2004
A well-to-do London divorce lawyer thinks he is ruined because he has become - unwittingly - a litigant in one of his future cases.

Hard to start this review without giving a bit of a history lesson. This old stage chestnut seemed to tickle the pre-war Britain audience and bringing it to the screen - pretty much as-is - was seen as a sure-thing.

You also have to remember that in those days divorce, hotel rooms and gay (in the original sense of the word) women where seen as racy. Indeed getting a divorce was beyond many a pocket as you had to prove adultery (or some other fault) in a court of law. Hence the tiptoeing private detective!

Great to see the triumvirate of Lawrence Olivier, Ralph Richardson and Merle Oberon about their craft. Especially in material that is more comedic than serious. All people worth learning about. Sadly the colour (nitrate) negative seems to have deteriorated (as it does!) and now has the look of a 8 mm home movie. While still watchable - in this form - some showings may revert to black and white.

Olivier was always best with some kind of humorous undercurrent. Here he is not yet at the top of his game - and was never any kind of Carry Grant when he was - but plays the confused lead with some gusto. Richardson remains an enigma - the "best Falstaff of all time" say some - but more personality than actor. He could only be variations on himself, although perfect in roles such as this: An upper-class gentleman's club bore. The mixed race Oberon (they always lit her face with strong light to disguise her Indian skin tint) actually has the nerve to twinkle and scene-steal. Hollywood soon took notice.

This isn't essential stuff unless you are a fan of the three principles or like British cinema-light. Olivier hadn't - at that time - totally mastered screen acting but was about to go in to his best work, which includes Wuthering Heights (which he was not true to the book - but very memorable) and Henry V (which is a breathtaking film).

This is a comedy of manners and maybe some of the comedy comes from the dated aspects of those manners.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Don't miss this gem!
Wilde_child14 May 2003
Warning: Spoilers
English Shakesperean actor (Sir) Laurence Olivier wasn't very fond of making films, however, his silver screen performances were so impeccable and professional, you can swear he was born to do it.

THE DIVORCE OF LADY X is a delightful light comedy, elegantly conducted, though notably dated.

Due to a heavy fog, some people who are taking part in a Ball at a hotel are prevented from travelling and advised to spend the night there.

Logan, an irritable, handsome lawyer refuses to share his room with a couple of women, but is persuaded to let Leslie (played by beautiful Merle Oberon), a perky, charming lady, sleep at his room, after she daringly imposes herself on him.

Their first acquaintance is a bit turbulent, but they soon hit it off, although he thinks she is married, which results in a couple of embarrassing, deliciously funny situations.

Watch out for Ralph Richardson playing a small role.

Olivier and Oberon had an incredible chemistry on screen.

WUTHERING HEIGHTS is another marvellous film they did together.

If old-fashioned romantic comedies catch your fancy, don't miss this wonderful film.

My rating: 10 out of 10
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
perfect to curl up with a love one under a blanket on cool a cool evening and watch
madoc15 August 2001
An incredible little English film for so many reasons. First it's a rare look a Laurence Olivier in a light comedy. While his performance is not up the standard he would latter set as one of the greatest actors of the 20th century, he is perfectly believable as the hoodwinked barrister. Historically this film is of great interest because of both where and when it was shoot. Being English it didn't have the big budget of the Hollywood films of the same era and it often shows, but more interesting is the fact this movie filmed just prior to the war and shows an England that would soon be gone. When we watch it today we think in terms of modern morality and over look the fact that this movie and its closest American counter part `It Happened One Night' were in their day as risqué as `Fatal Instinct' was in our time. But after watching and enjoying this movie the first time I can't help but feel sadness when I watch it today. With half of film shoot before 1950 gone, saving the remaining films means hard choices, and unfortunately films like this are often passed over to save movies that we all consider important. The color shifting, lack of contrast, and generally poor quality of the print most often seen is heartbreaking. This movie along with `It Happened One Night' are perfect to curl up with a love one under a blanket on cool a cool evening and watch, or better yet why not a double feature.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Mannered comedy of manners
cherold25 August 2016
Divorce of Lady X is a screwball comedy that captures the basic screwball formula but fails to be actually funny.

Olivier plays the staid guy while Oberon plays the wacky dame who disrupts his life. This leads to mistaken identities and general chaos.

It's a formula that worked great in Bringing Up Baby, but fails here. There are a number of reasons. The direction is static, often revealing its origins as a stage play. Olivier is stiff, and Oberon tries to hard in what was to become known many years later as the manic pixie role.

While many screwball comedies take their time getting their stars from hate to love, Lady X jumps the gun. This is particularly problematic because Oberon's character is genuinely awful, manipulative and self centered, and she never achieves the charming playfulness necessary to make that seem cute. Meanwhile, Olivier is a bitter misogynist. And yes, terrible people can fall in love, but it's still not convincing here.

The mistaken identity part is a good idea but is completely unpersuasive, requiring Olivier to be dumb as a box and Oberon to reach an almost sociopathic level of scheming.

Screwball comedies rely on charm and chemistry, as in Bringing Up Baby or It Happened One Night. Here the leads have iffy chemistry (they did better later on with Wuthering Heights) and not a whole lot of charm (at least by American standards; perhaps charm just isn't a British thing?).

Yes, it's got big stars, but it's an old creaky movie that simply isn't all that good.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Droll humour at its best
Flippitygibbit17 September 2004
I loved the dialogue above all - the sharp and witty banter between British 'icons' Olivier and Oberon, and even the playful back and forth between Morton Selten as Lord Steele and H.B. Hallam as his long-suffering butler, Jeffries. Binnie Barnes was also superb as Lady Mere; her accent might have slipped, but she definitely had the right attitude for her character! The use of colour was also a plus, particularly with the wonderful outfits. I think Merle Oberon would have done better without the continuous close-ups - though she did have a certain magnetism, she doesn't quite hold up to such inspection - and Olivier was definitely better suited to the stage: indeed, that is probably where he thought he was, judging by the delivery of some of his character's lines. The improbability of the story aside, 'The Divorce of Lady X' is a wry 'snapshot' of its era: gender, class, morality - even weather (it's very hard to believe that London had smog so bad that people were unable to travel, but it did happen).
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
**1/2
edwagreen19 March 2016
Warning: Spoilers
A year before they made the memorable "Wuthering Heights," Merle Oberon and Laurence Olivier starred together in this comedy revolving around appropriate behavior, correspondents and carrying out a falsehood to its utmost degree.

Did you notice that as the film went on, Oberon looked a lot older than the dashing Laurence, the attorney in the film who worked on divorce cases?

The first scene is a lengthy one and to be perfectly honest, I could not wait for it to end. Due to a terrible foggy night in London, patrons at a ball are unable to secure lodging at a hotel and Oberon pushes her way into sharing Olivier's room. He is a bit stuffy and she is overly forward as we see the trials and tribulations of sharing a room only for one evening.

When someone else who did the same thing is sued for divorce, Olivier thinks that the wife is Oberon and the rest of the film is devoted to his dilemma. As it becomes more apparent regarding what is going on, everyone laughs and Olivier is humiliated when the truth finally comes out.

This is really an inane farce, over-stated, but the question of womanhood is well touched by Olivier at film's end.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Merle Oberon Steals Olivier's Bed And Heart
boblipton27 August 2020
The facts in this movie are simple. An impenetrable London fog forces divorce lawyer Laurence Olivier to take refuge in a hotel overnight. A costume ball forces him to take a suite. Finally, Merle Oberon forces her way into his room and winkles him out of his bedroom. Naturally, after this Meet Cute, they fall in love; and naturally Ralph Richardson comes in the next afternoon to seek advice on a divorce from his wife, Binnie Barnes, who attended that ball and was reported to have spent the night with a man; and naturally Olivier assumes it's Miss Oberon -- or Mrs. Korda, as she would become in 18 months -- who is the grand daughter of Morton Selten, the judge of all of Olivier's cases, who has a dreadful history of five or six marriages, two of them to men of the same name. My lord, that is the explanation of the plot of this movie.

The copy of this movie movie that played yesterday on Turner Classic Movies is a beautiful example of early British Technicolor, even though the colors are rather dull and proper. Director Tim Whelan has a tough job in making Miss Oberon adorable even as she steals a good night's sleep from Olivier, and later to fascinate him as a scarlet woman. He doesn't quite succeed. Neither is Olivier particularly interesting as a frequently grumpy fellow eager to believe the worst about a girl of whom he believes the worst. Still, it has its fine moments, particularly Richardson as an increasingly drunk cuckold, and H.B. Hallam as Selten's butler. Everyone has his or her moments, but despite a workmanlike handling of the movie, it remains an enjoyable but never superior movie.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
fairly amusing and very English!
didi-524 November 2007
In rather wishy-washy Technicolor, this comedy of manners which the US did so well, and the UK less so, puts Laurence Olivier and Merle Oberon together (they would make a good team in Wuthering Heights as well) as the couple who set off on a mistaken identity trial where Olivier's barrister thinks he is arranging the divorce of Oberon's husband because of her staying in his hotel room ...

It is a story that's been done a lot, and often better than this, but the playing of the leads means there is a certain amount of comedy and a bit of a mischievous spark from Oberon, who knows she has to catch this particular fish, but hatches an elaborate plan to do so.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fun little screwball-ish comedy
jem13225 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
A comedy that worked surprisingly well was the little British effort "The Divorce Of Lady X (1938)" . It marks the first pairing of Laurence Olivier and Merle Oberon, before that little film about uncontrollable passion on the 19th century English moors. And while Olivier and Oberon are not particularly well-suited to screwball comedy, it all flows along nicely. Oberon is Leslie, a young woman who ends up in priggish divorce lawyer Logan's (Olivier) hotel suite by way of a nasty English fog preventing travel. She does everything possible to irritate him--but, in the crazy way films go, he falls for her. And she falls for him. But a serious case of mistaken identity occurs when Oberon's "Lady X" (that's all she leaves Oliver in a note) is thought by Olivier to be a married woman. To make matters worse, and more amusing, Lord Mere (Ralph Richardson) goes to Olivier wanting a divorce from his wife whom dear Larry thinks must be Oberon! There is some nice battle-of-the-sexes dialogue, and fun exploration of sexual politics. You can see that Olivier is not too confident with the comedy, but in true Olivier he's a consummate professional, and delivers. And he handles the screwball twists and turns, maybe not with ease, but with gusto. Oberon was no great shakes as an actress, but she was usually competent enough, and despite their reputed off-screen dislike of her, worked well with Olivier. This was filmed in early Technicolour that looks very primitive today (everyone looks even whiter than Michael Jackson), but perhaps the print needs cleaning up.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Didn't think I'd like this but I loved it!
1930s_Time_Machine30 November 2023
What a surprise! I find most 1930s comedies decidedly unfunny, a lot irritating, a few reasonably amusing and a handful such as OH MR PORTER and BRINGING UP BABY funny - this now joins that select list.

We're not too sure whether we're going to like Larry and Merle in this when it begins. She's a self-centred, spoilt brat and he's your typical 1930s toff - the sort of person who never says please and thank you. By virtue of a clever script, dynamic direction and excellent acting, although you've got nothing in common with this pair you quickly begin empathising with them and they become really likeable. That ticks the most essential requirement for a film like this - it's thoroughly enjoyable.

Olivier could easily have been a successful star of light comedies had he wished. If you'd have never seen him in anything else, watching this you'd just assume that he was a leading light comedy actor like William Powell. In this picture he's an entitled, stiff-shirted snob but a cuddly teddy bear under the surface. We like him but we still want to see him knocked down a peg of two and put back in his place and that's exactly what happens. It's good to see this arrogant toff shown up as a hopeless gullible twerp getting taught a lesson for being so sexist

Had she not gone down the dramatic route, Merle Oberon could have been an English Joan Blondell. She's absolutely delightful in this and unlike most 1930s female roles, it's her who is firmly in charge here.

It's also in colour - in fact England's first proper Technicolor feature and whilst us 1930s film fans swoon over the nuanced shadows of black and white photography, the colour really adds an extra dimension making it extra special. If you like films from this era and are frustrated with the disappointment that most 30s comedies aren't funny, watch this.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A rather charming comedy of manners
GusF3 March 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Based on the 1931 play "Counsel's Opinion" by Gilbert Wakefield, this is a rather charming comedy of manners. The film was more fun than funny, to be honest. It reminded me of a P. G. Wodehouse story where the razor sharp wit had been dulled a little. There was a great deal of comic potential in the film but it is not explored as effectively as it could be. That said, it has pretty good script by Lajos Bíró, Ian Dalrymple and Arthur Wimperis and is reasonably well directed by Tim Whelan. The Technicolor was more adequate than glorious, I'm afraid. The self-consciously light-hearted music by Miklós Rózsa is a little distracting, particularly in the overlong hotel room scenes.

The film stars Laurence Olivier in quite a good performance as Everard Logan, a divorce lawyer with a rather high opinion of himself and a rather low opinion of women's morality. Due to a particularly thick fog ("a real pea souper") even by London's standards, the attendees of a costume ball are forced to stay in the Royal Park Hotel, which is not exactly a refugee camp admittedly, for the night instead of returning home as they had originally intended. As the hotel is fully booked, the manager suggests availing of the kindness of those guests with suites so that several people may sleep in their living rooms. Logan is such a guest but he is not too obliging as he is exhausted after two days of sleep and knows that any woman in his suite would be able to sweet talk him into giving up his bed. However, the adventurous Leslie Steele, played somewhat variably by the producer Alexander Korda's soon-to- be wife Merle Oberon, refuses to take "no" for an answer and sneaks into his room. Hijinks ensue.

These hijinks are certainly the weakest part of the film as they seem a little out of step with the rest of the film's predominantly dialogue orientated scenes. As often happens in romantic comedies, their bickering turns to love in the blink of an eye. Things become more complicated when Logan's acquaintance Lord Mere, played by the interminably dull Ralph Richardson, tells him that he wants a divorce as his wife is cheating on him since her maid saw her exit the room of a man at the Royal Park Hotel. In a classic comic misunderstanding that is used fairly well in the film, Logan incorrectly assumes that Leslie is, in fact, Lady Mere. When she discovers this, she does not disabuse him of that notion as she wants to have a little fun at his expense. This involves adopting Lady Mere's romantic history as her own, which includes three former husbands and "episodes" with Mr. Miller the First, Mr. Miller the Second and Senor Mendoza from the Argentine.

I have often said that Olivier is my absolute favourite actor and I stand by that but the role of Logan was not one that played to his strengths. In later comedies such as "The Demi-Paradise" and "The Prince and the Showgirl", he played his roles straight with wonderful results. On this occasion, however, he sent up the material quite a bit and that approach doesn't really work terribly well for either his performance or the film itself. I never particularly wanted to see Laurence Olivier do a pratfall but he does one in this film, which is probably not the first thing that he mentioned on his hugely impressive CV. He is certainly much better in the film's calmer and more serious moments than in its more slapstick ones. There are flashes of brilliance here and there where his great skill as an actor was evident but I don't think that this is a film that really suited his style of acting. Or maybe vice versa. Or both. It may have been better with another actor but, to be honest, I watched it for the sole reason that Olivier was in it.

The film also features good performances from Edward VII's alleged illegitimate son Morton Selten as Leslie's stern but loving grandfather Lord Steele, an imposing judge whom Logan often faces in the divorce courts, and Binnie Barnes as the real Lady Mere. Incidentally, Barnes played Leslie in the play's 1933 adaptation under its original title, which is now a lost film and one of the 75 lost films on the BFI's Most Wanted List. Check your attics.

Overall, this is a nice, charming film which is wonderfully English at times but it could have benefited from stronger writing and performances.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The Divorce of Lady X review
JoeytheBrit22 April 2020
A young Laurence Olivier demonstrates his complete unsuitability for comedy in this mild farce from Korda, while the dodgy colour does the usually ravishing Merle Oberon absolutely no favours. To make matters worse, The Divorce of Lady X borders on the tedious as it sets about creating a situation that relies upon intelligent people behaving like idiots, and a supposedly lovable, carefree heroine systematically messing with the mind of the man who loves her.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Charming and Delightful!
Sindaannuniel6 February 2004
I have become quite fond of Laurence Olivier in the past few weeks, and was thrilled when I discovered this gem. I have always found it wonderful when I run across a film where I do not have to have my finger on the remote control in case nudity rears its ugly head.

The Divorce of Lady X is charming till the final scene, and must have been a true delight for viewers back in 1938. I only wish people today could accept and love true humor instead of the horrid trash talk people now call funny.

The Divorce of Lady X is well worth anyone's time.
13 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Trendy by the standards of 1938, but very dated today
JamesHitchcock8 November 2014
Warning: Spoilers
The British cinema did not make many colour films in the thirties and forties, and the ones they did make often seemed ill-chosen. At least the Americans tended to reserve Technicolor for their more spectacular movies. I have never, for example, really understood why David Lean chose to make that dull domestic drama "This Happy Breed" in colour, and "The Divorce of Lady X"- a very early example of British Technicolor- is another which would have worked just as well in black-and-white.

Leslie Steele, a young socialite attending a charity ball at a London hotel, has to stay overnight because of a particularly bad "pea-souper" fog. As there are no rooms available, she is forced to share a suite with Everard Logan, a handsome young barrister specialising in divorce cases. Leslie is single, but a misunderstanding makes Logan believe that she is married, and she plays along with this misapprehension. Later Logan is approached by an old school friend, Lord Mere, who asks him to represent him in a divorce suit against his wife whom he suspects of adultery. Logan has never met Lady Mere, who happens to have been another guest at the same party, and a further series of misunderstandings leaves Logan convinced firstly that Lady Mere was the woman who spent the night in his suite and secondly that he himself is the man whom Lord Mere suspects of being his wife's lover. To complicate matters further, he is starting to fall in love with Leslie, even though he believes her to be another man's wife. Despite all these complications, he agrees to take on the case.

This was a remake of another film, "Counsel's Opinion", made only five years earlier by the same company, London Films. (Binnie Barnes, who plays Lady Mere here, appeared as Leslie in the earlier film). I have never seen "Counsel's Opinion", but the fact that it was remade so soon afterwards, in the then very expensive medium of Technicolor, suggests that the story was a popular one in the thirties. Today, however, it is difficult to understand why. To start with, it is obvious that the scriptwriters had very little legal knowledge. This becomes clear when Logan, in the middle of cross-examining a witness, suddenly launches into a lengthy tirade against modern women, only dubiously relevant to the subject of his cross-examination, without incurring the immediate severe rebuke from the Judge which would be the reward of any barrister who tried such tactics in real life. As a barrister, Logan would not have been permitted to receive instructions direct from his client rather than via a solicitor. And, most importantly, you don't need to know much about legal etiquette to realise that the idea of a lawyer prosecuting a case in which he himself might be named as a co-respondent is quite absurd.

These legal howlers might have been forgivable if the film had been made as a zany farce- there is, after all, something farcical about the idea of a lawyer ending up suing himself through a series of misunderstandings- but in a romantic comedy set in the world of the law they are simply embarrassing. They are not, however, the only reason why the story just does not work today. The best thing about the film is the lovely Merle Oberon. (Her husband, Alexander Korda, acted as producer). Laurence Olivier, however, seems strangely miscast. Now I have never been an adherent of that school of thought which holds that Olivier could not convincingly play any character born after around 1600, but light comedy was never really his forte, and he seems rather stiff as Logan. (His comedic skills did not improve with age, either. In "The Prince and the Showgirl", a film he himself directed some twenty years later, he was to prove even worse than he is here).

The main problem, however, is that tastes in humour have changed since 1938. Comedies about divorce and remarriage were very popular in the American cinema around this period, and although the British tended to be more Puritanical about such matters, films like this were not unknown on this side of the Atlantic. Now some of the American comedies of divorce were very good; "The Philadelphia Story", for example, must still rank as one of the best comedies ever made. Others, however, have dated badly; one example which comes to mind is "My Favourite Wife", even though it shared a leading man (Cary Grant) with "The Philadelphia Story". An important part of their original appeal is that they were considered modern, daring and ground-breaking and a way of showing just how modern, daring and ground-breaking the 1930s and 1940s were in comparison to the boring, fuddy-duddy 1910s and 1920s. Any objections from moralists could be overcome by pointing out that many of them end with the feuding couple still together or remarried. (In "The Divorce of Lady X" Lord and Lady Mere eventually reconcile when he discovers she is innocent of any wrongdoing).

More than sixty years on, however, films like this are no longer seen as daring or modern; in fact, the social attitudes they enshrine often seem very outdated. "The Divorce of Lady X" probably never had much going for it beyond the fact that it was trendy by the standards of 1938. That, unfortunately, does not in itself make it worth seeing in 2014. 4/10
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
nice
Kirpianuscus18 April 2023
I saw it for presence in cast of Merle Oberon and Laurence Olivier. And , after final credits, it remains the good reason. Because it is one of many easy romantic comedies of time, with a small misunderstanding as knott, with a very forced- unrealistic end, with fair manner to create his grandfather by Morton Selten and a nice Magyar restaurant.

The reason to appreciate it is a mix of nostalgia and passion for old Hollywood. But, in essence, nothing more.

In short, just pleasant, charming, amusing and good opportunity to discover a couple on screen out of so familiar images of 1939 Wuthering Heights.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed