Faces of Death IV (1990) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
23 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
There's a new (mad) doctor in town
Zbigniew_Krycsiwiki17 December 2003
Mindless direct-to-video continuation of the "Faces of Death" series, basically this is just a remake of the highlights from the first movie, but this time there is a new narrator in the bald, bug eyed "Dr. Louis Flellis" talking about his obsession with death and the afterlife all the while sitting in front of a bright glowing lava lamp(!). Did the original narrator really die, like it says in this movie? Or did he just not want to do another sequel and this is just part of the story? The guy in the auto yard that supposedly had his leg severed when a car fell on him doesn't make any sense: wouldn't the car have fallen on top of him, crushing his entire body, not just his leg? I also liked the mental patient that was wearing a bright yellow jumpsuit with the word "FELON" clearly written on the back of it.

Curiously, the thief that was locked in the airtight bank vault for over 40 hours and supposedly suffocated also looked strangely like this series' writer/ director/ producer etc. John Alan Schwartz. Can it be another one of his cameos? Who knows?
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Last of the official FOD films but not cut up.
Radish4ever18 May 2013
After a graphic opening during the main credits we are introduced to Dr Louise Flellis. A Neurosurgeon who has taken over from Dr Francis B Gross from the first 3 films. Who sadly died but forgot to film it so not in this latest gathering of real and fake (mostly fake footage). Although like the previous entries, the fake stuff is a laugh, but while your chuckling you suddenly get the real footage and it soon wipes the smile off your face, unless you have a cast iron stomach of course. The most memorable is the scenes with the Indonesian family eating puppies, fortunately its only a teddy bear used and looks like one too. Also the bunji jumping students, that jump off a 12 storey building that use a cord thats too long as "there was no 12 floor".

The only FOD entry to be released uncut in the UK and probably one of the worst in the series, along with part 3. FOD 1 & 2 are the best in the series by a mile.

James B. Schwartz is the latest actor to pretend to be a Doctor in this, after Michael Carr (a cameraman) pretended to be a similar Consultant in the earlier films. Obviously to gain some authenticity. Schwartz is the Directors brother (John alias Conan Le Cilaire) The cast were anonymous for years but after the film gained a massive cult following, they all came out the woodwork a few years ago. Worst of Faces of Death and FOD fact or fiction were also made as extras for the DVD which was made before the makers came out. The recent region 1 Blu-ray has the real cast in interviews and audio commentaries. The films made a lot of money so what can you say. The end song is a lot of fun in a cheesy way.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
quite a bad horror movie....
MovieGuy0129 October 2009
I thought that Faces of Death 4 was quite a bad horror film. It Follows the same pattern of the other Faces of Death movies. In this one there are many staged and unstaged looking deaths ranging from bungee jumping accidents and magic tricks which have gone bad. It was mostly the same type of video footage as in the the other films, although this copy that i own is an uncut version. I found this one to be a much better film than the last one as it contained a bit more interesting footage in it. I would not recommend these film to a lot of people as they contain quite graphic images that some viewers may not be able to watch. 3/10
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I'm in this god-forsaken movie
a_rural118 September 2006
Every once in a while I google Faces of Death just to see what's out there, and I found this site. I was working one of the god-awfullest jobs in my EMT career in NYC one morning in 1988 at around 6:30 when we got the call for a "space case" in the subway at W. 66 and Broadway. This poor unfortunate trying to cross from the Uptown side to the Downtown side via the tracks, and didn't quite scramble up to the platform quickly enough before the train rolled in. Well, it was rush hour, and we were surrounded by freelance photographers and videographers trying to catch their last footage of the night (or first of the day) for the TV news, and our "patient" was still alive, although unconscious, so we had to offer advanced life support and remove him with the help of ESU. Apparently whoever took this footage couldn't sell it to the news in time, so he sold it instead to this monster who does the Faces of Death videos. You know, this was a serious call. I had the smell of that victim on me for days. But it was a public place, blah blah blah...fair game. P.S. He lived long enough to make it to the ER where he hung on even longer. Jesus, his torso was so twisted around, how did he last as long as he did!!!? It was grueling for us all the way to the bitter end. Oh, by the way, one of those paramedics working with me on the subway platform is Joe Connelly who wrote the book (which became a movie) Bringing out the Dead.
44 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"I'm not going to let a truck fully loaded sit on my stomach for five seconds anymore, it's just too dangerous." At least it's better than part III.
poolandrews29 July 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Faces of Death IV starts with graphic shots of a dead body & it's cremation. We, the viewer that is, are then introduced to Dr. Louis Flellis (writer James B. Schwartz) who has taken over from his recently deceased colleague Dr. Francis B. Gross (Michael Carr) who obviously jumped ship after he saw how rotten Faces of Death III (1985) turned out to be, Dr. Flellis claims that Dr. Gross went insane & is now dead. This instalment of the infamous series of documentaries follows the same patterns as those before it. Dr. Flellis narrates as we witness all manner of human & animal carnage, some real & some fake. The real footage consists of scenes like plane crashes, the remains of a suicide bomber, traffic accidents including one where a man is knocked of his motorbike by a speeding ambulance which then reverses & picks him up off the road, stunts gone wrong, animal cremation, third world police brutality & a trip around New York from subway accidents to people who've jumped from their hotel room window & landed on a car. The fake footage is easy to spot, there's a tiger attack where someone has their arm severed, a car falls on someone & their leg is severed, a bungled robbery, a fake dog being disembowelled & cooked, someone is drawn & quartered, an assassination of a drug dealer & some of his family, a silly bit that involves genetically mutated giant leeches & quite a gruesome sequence involving Satan worshippers & their house full of grisly secrets... Director John Alan-Schwartz again mixes real & fake footage with little regard for accuracy or factual intent. This is all about gore of which there is some but it isn't as shocking as the original Faces of Death (1978) strangely enough. For hardened gore lovers & extreme cinema enthusiasts Faces of Death IV is a little on the tame side, although most ordinary filmgoing audiences will probably find it both sick & disgusting which is fair enough I suppose. The fake parts are of reasonable quality but most of the real stuff is of very poor camcorder quality, but then what did you expect, art? This is OK for it's type but it doesn't exactly stand out in a genre where your supposed to...
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Should Be Faces of Dupe
Matrixx05820 July 2002
As a Pathology/Histology Technician I have the ability to both see and experience the most saddest aspect of life, and that is the passing of a fellow human being. As such, I think not only should Faces of Death be revealed as it truly is, an insensitive exploitation of those unable to speak for themselves, it should also be banned for the violation of their rights as fellow human beings. In the industry of death, we all hold dignity, respect and compassion as our first priority to those who have crossed over and that death being a personal experience should not be mocked for the purposes of advancing ones own financial interests...the producers should really contemplate their intents, and people who are not registered Pathologists should not call themselves as such.
20 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Complete P.O.S.
slitherk14 May 2010
I thought this movie might be a ridiculous guilty shocking pleasure in the mold of Mondo Cane. I was wrong.

The footage is almost entirely fake. But it is not fake in a camp cheesy kind of way that would be redeeming, it is just fake in an annoying, utterly transparent way. A few scenes appear to be real newsreel stock footage, but these are a small portion of the total. Most are the kind of quality that would be cooked up by several high school students with red paint and a camera. Plus, there is gratuitous right wing propaganda worked into the narration for no apparent reason.

Don't waste your time.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Faces of Dud
Coventry22 January 2007
After suffering my way through the original "Faces of Death", I promised myself NEVER to watch any of the six (or is it seven) sequels, as this was the most inept, pathetic, provocative and boring bunch of nonsense I ever saw. But hey, I've been known to break promises before – especially to myself – and at least I didn't spend one lousy penny on this one. According to random reviews I read on the Internet, part four is supposed to be one of the "better" entries in this wannabe-cult series and I must admit it opens with a positive announcement. Dr. Francis B. Gross, the host of the first four films, apparently died due to his obsession with the other side. Great news, as I really couldn't stand the look of his face and he was the most incompetent narrator ever! A certain Dr. Louis Flellis now fills up his place, and this guy has the craziest pair of eyes I've ever seen! Is he supposed to intimidate us with his overlong stares and forced grimaces, or something? Closely following the outdated formula, he presents a series of obviously fake clips in which people and animals die tragically. There are painful road accidents, images of warfare and sudden deaths, but also a whole lot of "provoked" situations, like drunken fraternity jokes that go awry, incautious sports and even a magician who fails to complete his escaping-act in time. Now that was funny! There's no real guideline or reoccurring theme in "Faces of Death"; the mad-eyed Dr. Flellis simply jibbers about how deceitful the Grim Reaper can be and how we should never underestimate the forces of destiny. Yawn! I can't easily tolerate the looks of stupid people faking their deaths and play along believing it's a documentary, but WHY involve the animals? Yes, we know people eat dogs in Vietnam and we are aware that abattoirs slay pigs for their meat, but why do these phony-controversial makers of "Faces of Death" feel the need to add footage of this in their films and pretend to be educational? People die in accidents and humans kill animals. Imitating these sad events and capturing it on film isn't shock-cinema; it's merely just stating the obvious. We're all going to die at one point, anyway.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
90% faked... and poorly at that.
clevershark19 January 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Basically this film's a mix-bag of old news footage and poor fakes. It's a very low-budget film and it shows -- clearly the producers of this film had very little money for actors, so you actually recognize the faces of the "participants" in a lot of the scenes which are said to occur in very different places and times. You'll see someone die tragically one moment, then miraculously come to life again for the next tragedy... this is a very silly film, but then that's pretty obvious from the over-the-top introduction by "Dr. Louis Flellis".

Even if you don't have a good eye for faces, the faked nature of many of the "shocking footage recently recovered" is so obvious it's a wonder anyone can not spot it. The "bungee" scene, supposedly taken with one camera on the roof, has a cinematic cut to another scene at ground level. In the tiger scene, the wounded man mysteriously changes clothes between the time of the attack and the arrival of the paramedics (he starts off in camouflage, but ends up wearing blue coveralls, and his hair changes color too). I understand the whole "voluntary suspension of disbelief" idea, but this film is quite poor even by exploitation flick standards.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Real
mechapman_ii-129 March 2005
Some of the scenes in this movie seem fake, but are 100% real, you would actually know that if you did even the slightest bit of research. All parts of all the movies are 100% real- that is why they are banned in most countries- including America. If fake, why aren't horror movies banned when they show more gore than this series of movies combined? Good, dark horror, mixed with real stories, real footage, and you have Faces of Death, banned in every state of America, and 47 other countries. You can't really call these movies, they are documentaries, purely. A great set of documentaries, for the dark, demented people out there, and there are some, and I am one of them.
0 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Adorable Miner Dies?
mollylusian18 May 2011
Warning: Spoilers
To those who think ALL the scenes are real, I hate to burst your bubble. The West Virginia miner scene was filmed in Alabama at De Soto Caverns. How do I know? My husband "died" in that scene.

They even used his real name Ralph. If you pay close attention, you'll notice he was later one of the guys who carried out his own "dead" body.

He was a young graduate of the University of Alabama at the time and was paid in pizza and beer.

I rated the movie a 10 only because Ralph was so cute and young at the time. Otherwise, the movie is very low brow and ridiculous.

I assure you, Ralph is very much alive and still pretty damn cute.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Curiosity kills our brain
bghorror10 December 1999
This movie is a perfect example of where curiosity leads us in life. Faces Of Death 4, like the previous films, dares to shock us with more violent images of (supposed) true life horror. It did it for me.....and will forever leave an impression on my mind that I'd rather not have.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An incisive and thoughtful series of pieces
meshegahgoyim22 February 2006
The fourth installment of the "Faces of Death" series arrived on the heels of tragedy: Dr. Francis B. Gross, the brand's original narrator, expired during pre-production -- "driven mad," it is reported, "by the desire to determine the cause of his own death."

In his place, the eminent necrologist Louis Flellis performs admirably. An grisly subway accident prompts the host to rail passionately against those who would champion life's beauty..."I just show these friends of mine some of these pictures -- that usually shuts them up."

Flellis also provides thought provoking interpretations of the Second Amendment and the dining practices of Oriental peoples.

Those of you who were stimulated by the first three episodes shall not be disappointed. A solemn guarantee.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
For the guy who said it's real...
ienjoyhoagies2 April 2006
You said it has to be real, otherwise why is it banned everywhere including the U.S.

Ummm.... I've lived in three different states in the U.S. and it was widely available to rent on video in all three. Now maybe I just "coincidentally" happened to live in the three states where they allow it, but I doubt it.

You see, they put that it's been "banned" in so many places to make it sound cooler so people will rent it. It's a lie you buffoon.

Yes, most of the scenes are fake. But it was still pretty fun to watch back in the day.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Definitely cheezy stuff
one4now422 October 2003
As many should know by now, most of the things that are shown in these movies (at least, in the first four) are either staged or dull news footage. That said, there are so many mixed feelings I have about this one. I liked the darkly humorous narration of "Dr. Louis Flellis", and some of the nasty stuff was kind of neat (almost all of which was faked, I can guarantee). It wasn't nearly as shocking or effective as I'd hoped, but I suppose that that's a good thing in some scenes (puppy that's really a plush doll getting disemboweled, anyone?). I do like a lot of the no-nonsense political and social commentary the narrator makes, but sometimes it is very dishonest, like when we see the slaughterhouse footage and the narrator goes beyond the educational aspects of that scene's dialogue and panders to sick people's desire to enjoy pain and suffering of an animal. I do eat meat, and that includes pork, but some of the comments seem as if they're made simply to enhance entertainment value of real pigs having the blood drained from their throats. Even if I'm not a vegetarian, I do believe that more respect should be had for an animal instead of just regarding it as something that landed on your plate, as well as a realization that that animal died to help you survive. Also, there is some dialogue in the narration that seems outright right-wing. I don't go for the right or left wings, but that also means that some of the snotty dialogue in this grates on me a bit at times. Otherwise, this is a pretty diverting time-waster for people who might be interested in this sort of thing. I just don't understand what the big deal is when all those series out there that rip off these mostly fake "Faces of Death" movies are usually more real and disturbing than almost any of the things shown here. (Please note: The original "Faces of Death" is very different and it is actually a GOOD movie, even if it's by far more disturbing, as well as nearly as faked. See that one, for sure, no matter what you've heard, for it may surprise you.)
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good Death Scenes
Darkman49010 March 2002
I Had never even seen Faces of Death until I went to my local video store and rented it. At first I thought it was fantastic until they showed the chinese people cutting up that cute little puppy and eating it. But other than that Faces of Death 4 is without a doubt the best in the series. SO FAR
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Goofy
davidmccollum7 November 2002
I'd say about 90% of this movie is fake. It's not shocking or anything. The doctor was pretty fun. I love it when he pulls out the gun and says that he defends his rights, and the other goofy things he says. The real footage is just brief clips of news footage of people getting beat and stuff, nothing really gory. It's insane it's considered so shocking...I'd say it's only PG-13.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Catchy ending tune, everything else is a bit of a dud...
NYGuy3225 November 2003
I recently purchased a box set that had the 1st 4 Faces of Death in it yes, it is corny and mostly faked, but I must admit, the ending song in Faces of Death IV was actually pretty good, in a corny kind of way. The lyrics were good, and the overall song (though it is played over a scene of dead bodies as the result of a bandstand collapsing, which does make it a little tasteless...even if these supposed dead bodies do look very fake), was very well sung.

Overall, besides the song, FOD IV is the weakest one in the series in my opinion.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
like warm toast on a cool september day
rob brun19 February 1999
i think that exploitation has reached its ultimate peak. For those of you unfamiliar with faces of death- it is a weak, fake, and ultimately stupid series of supposed "real death" video series.

for all of you jerry springer watching youths- this will probably be the best movie you have ever seen. For everyone else, rent something else. Yeah, i want to spend $3 to watch chinese people cut up a puppy while it is still alive and then eat it. Time to move on with my life.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Best of the Sequels
Michael_Elliott20 April 2016
Faces of Death IV (1990)

** (out of 4)

To understand the cult nature or love for the FACES OF DEATH series means you had to have been a teenager back in the 80s when VHS rentals were the thing. If you went to school you probably heard of this notorious series that featured real deaths. The series and its reputation grew through lies passed around schools about the gruesome footage that the video contained.

Of course, as you grew up, you finally realized that what you were watching was mostly staged scenes and the series pretty much died out after several sequels and rip-offs. The first film remains rather catchy just due to its reputation and rather twisted atmosphere. The second film had some memorable scenes but was mostly forgettable. The third in the series was without question the worst and featured some of the most embarrassing filmmaking you'll ever see. This fourth film is actually the best of the bunch because it doesn't try to be anything other than a bunch of gore scenes.

This one here tries to pass itself off as being real but I'm pretty sure at this point the producers knew that the secret was out of the bag so we got some rather clever scenes of murder, suicide and destruction. Such re-enactments include a mental guy who kills three people with a screwdriver inside a hospital. There's a nuclear plant dumping toxic into a lake, which creates a large leech that attacks a woman. Youv'e got drunk college students being ran over by boats as well as jumping off roofs. You've got car wrecks as well as a Mafia execution caught on tape.

There's quite a bit of gore in this installment, which helps make it much better than the previous sequels. Again, you can't really take this series serious and must try to get entertainment out of its gore. The most memorable scene here is a sequence where we meet a Vietnamese family who show us how to prepare a cute little puppy for dinner. This here is one of the most talked about moments in the series and it became quite notorious in the hallways at countless schools.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The big question is answered
Rupert__Pupkin16 December 2001
Every one I know who has had the pleasure or displeasure of watching any of the Faces of Death movies asks the same question: Is it real? While most of us tend to think not, there is still some question. The answer is in the movie. If you read the end of the credits, you will see at the very end there is a disclaimer which reads, "Some of the scenes may have been reenacted from actual events." So if there was any doubt that the scenes were in fact real, guess again. Now some of the footage they showed was real, but every scene that involved beer-swizzling teens, the scene with the magician, the miners, the giant leech, the orchestra at the end, and every other scene which featured before and after footage was fabricated. Interesting idea, but not that interesting. 3/10
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
It ain't half bad, kids!
The Bounce10 May 2000
This movie is, according to most viewers, a gruesome showcase on accidental deaths on videotape. In my opinion, it's a 'Best of'-horror catalogue by some kids who were to damn lazy to write a plot, but did have the tools to make an okay horrorflick. And the makers has a good sense of humor as well, check out the bungee jump with the short elastic or the giant mutated leeches (thanks to a *drumroll* nuclear plant!). Please, do you really believe anybody died for real in this movie? Think again. The greatest joke is not that the makers want to believe you it's all real, but that most suckers do. As fake as part 1, 2 and 3. But funnier. Even though the the Yeti-footage in Faces of Death 3, a.k.a. Fear, was a hoot as well.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Exploitation Documentary Cinema: Faces of Death Flicks
mysterycity2315 October 2011
So many of the Exploitation Docs are largely neglected by the establishment still today, so I appreciate all those who rate these cool campy flicks. Faces of Death tests the limits of contemporary(middle-class) acceptability; it does not meet any standards as far as continuity and direction, but, SO WHAT? If all film were to capitulate to that silly mantra, we would have no Todd Sheets, no Troma, pornography, No Wave music, Outsider Art -etc. Fantasy, people! If you expect technical cinematography, or a model motion picture from any Faces of Death flick, you will be sadly disappointed. These films are overtly low-class, low-brow, and low- taste in content, style, and art direction (or lack thereof). Yet, for all the would-be dictators of public opinion, who admonish the endeavors of folks like the F.O.D. team, there are hedonistic reprobates such as yours truly who bask in, and subscribe to, the campy nature of exploitation cinema. It exploits a subject matter that the status quo generally negates: death itself. Even the exploitation genre is loathe to approach this level of depravity as far as the action of death. Is it in good taste? Absolutely not. The concept of good taste is intricately woven into society's collective mind, and of course, class structure. Still, we have free will, and there are apparently enough of us who have found something good within the paragon of bad taste. Our sophisticated, "democratic" western world regulates the population's access to information, as well as its innermost attitudes, through media- particularly through film and video. The power to literally create desire, fashion and consumer trends, opinions, aspirations, and even ones own identity is expressed through film. Exploitation rebels against this control. And death is the medium through which F.O.D rebels; and its mystery gives it a power that traditional exploitation film dare not grasp. Power through persuasion is a billion dollar a year industry. The oppressive power structures, created by titans of industry, is developed in part to restrict people like me, and the F.O.D. folks from producing anything, because it indicates to the public that anyone with candor and a camcorder can use a medium that the everyday man can relate to. And this takes the power of persuasion away from them. Low-budget mondo-documentaries such as F.O.D. can be transcendent, nostalgic, and an invitation to share in what some consider a fun expression of a single persons quirky unique vision. What industry seeks to destroy, we exploitation lovers seek always to build. We are not the destructive ones. And they should go broke in their endeavor to oppress. Are all scenes authentic? Yes. Are they all actual scenes of death? It only matters if the true death is what is being exploited. It's not, though; instead, it's the act of violent death, and the audience that are being exploited. The issue of death, the fear or hatred or discomfort of violent death (particularly) -as viewed by the society , is what is exploited. That requires only authentic fear, hatred, discomfort, and issue. And in Faces of Death, this is quite authentic. And if that's too much to think about: have fun with it. The camp factor just heightens the experience. It allows for relief from the gravitas subject-matter. It reminds us that we are being manipulated -if only for a second- which is a kindness when we explore our feelings about violent death in a violent society during violent times. And let's face it, if there is anything that the Faces of Death crowd are trying to tell us, it's that humans are violent animals. It's possible, that our negation of this truth causes more harm than the actual truth. They are helping us, to deal with our own savagery. But that is for another day. The only criticism I have is that it eclipsed and over-shadowed a great film called The Killing of America (directed by Leonard Schrader, whose brother went on to write the screen play for Taxi driver). This movie is truly shocking, but is impossible to procure except ironically in th U.K., where F.O.D. is supposedly banned. This was one of the first campy films I saw as a kid. It was a catalyst for me to embark on my mission to become a connoisseur of "bad cinema." These marvelous movies changed my life. It is cliché for otherwise well-read people to deplore violence depicted in movies such as these. Violence cannot be eliminated through the repression of such material. We have a primal need to explore such attributes. In any case, let your hair down for a hair raising journey into ambiguity...that is if you are tall enough to ride this ride.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed