Pick-up (1975) Poster

(1975)

User Reviews

Review this title
32 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
You Ain't Gonna Get That Bonus This Way, Boy!
TheExpatriate70012 March 2010
When I selected this film out of a Drive-In Classics set, I was expecting a typical "don't hitchhike" exploitation / horror movie. What I actually got was something far more bizarre and interesting. Long story made short, two girls hitch a ride on a mobile home and end up stuck in the Everglades. Lots of sexual hijinks ensue.

What separates this film from any number of exploitation movies are the bizarre visions experienced by one mentally disturbed character. Although they border on the nonsensical, these sequences show a level of creativity not usually associated with this genre. Furthermore, whether by careful restoration, good quality film stock, or sheer luck, the film looks far better than many mainstream films from the 70s now on DVD.

That said, this film is not the work of art some fans make it out to be. The dialogue is often laughable, particularly in the case of the exasperated boss of the mobile home driver. Furthermore, the "Everglades" looks like it is actually an amusement park's safari ride- highly manicured and obviously not really wild. The sex scenes are basically soft core, and go on for so long that they become boring.

Overall, I cannot recommend this movie, but at the same time, it is just weird enough to be worth a rental.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
More art-house than grindhouse
Zeegrade30 September 2009
Don't let the abundance of positive votes for glowing reviews fool you. Packaged with other exploitation movies like Superchick and Malibu High, Pick-Up is nothing but pretentious wanderings filled with metaphysical mumbo-jumbo dialogue by Bernard Hirschenson who, no surprise, never directed again. Free spirited Carol and deep thinking Maureen hitch a ride with Chuck who must deliver a large RV from Miami to Tallahassee but somehow gets stuck in the Everglades where they prance around naked or partake in suedo-sacrificial ceremonies with Greek deities. Yeah, pure grindhouse experience there. At least the two young beauties bare their bodies consistently which is the only saving grace of this film. At some points in the movie a backstory is provided for the three travelers, albeit disjointedly, providing little insight into why they are at this particular station in life. I'm perfectly fine with the notion that Pick-Up has bigger meaning than I might give it credit, however this is not a movie that belongs in an exploitation collection. The cumulative score of 5.0 as I write this is more indicative of the fact that this is seen by most as an average at best film. This certainly is not an awful film, just not as good as some might make this out to be. Decide for yourself.
14 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
What a stinky pile of smelly 70's exploitation !!!!!!!
toyman196730 December 2009
I am beginning to think that I wasted my money on the Drive-In Cult Classics set!!!! This is the third movie that I watched from this 8-pack set and they are just getting worse and worse. I am not expecting academy award winners but I was expecting something at least watchable. The only good thing about this movie was the cool bus!!! I've seen hotter soft core porn on the late night Oxygen Channel show "Bliss". I do have to admit that the two lead women are 70's exploitation HOTTIES and that's why I'm giving this film 2 stars for obviously naked reasons. I sure do hope these movies in this set get better.
7 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Interesting movie, mis-marketed as a "grindhouse" flick
lazarillo6 September 2007
Strangely this movie got released again recently as part of a "Grindhouse Double Feature" DVD. Aside from the abundant nudity and softcore groping, it is not really what I expected. Rather than being sleazy and gritty like most old grindhouse movies, it's kind of arty, a little pretentious, and mostly just plain weird. It doesn't really fit in with stuff like "Hitchhike to Hell" or "The Hitchhikers" or the more exploitative youth-oriented films of the era.

A guy driving a tricked-out camper van and making some kind of mysterious delivery picks up two hippie chicks. One of them is a nymphomaniac, so of course they immediately have sex. The other is revealed to be suffering from religious delusions as the result of having been molested by a priest (a straight priest?--now I've heard everything!). After the threesome break down in the Florida Everglades the secrets of the girls begin to be revealed a little with flashbacks (between the sex scenes), but the movie also gets exponentially weirder.

As others have said the two girls are VERY pretty and not like the sleazy skanks that were often in these kind of movies. The cinematography is also very impressive and professional, and for a "grindhouse" movie they sure used a good looking, wide-screen print. The low-budget IS evidenced by a lack of sync sound in a lot of places (which might be the reason for the kind of nebulous plot and character development). With its emphasis on the visuals at the expense of plot and acting, this almost seems like a foreign movie of that era--like maybe Jean Rollin was slumming in the Florida Everglades. All in all, I guess I'd recommend it, especially if you're looking for a weird, arty hippie movie, but it seems pretty mis-marketed as a "grindhouse" flick.
92 out of 102 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Don't Waste Your Time! Unless You're High
swinggold27 January 2011
This is essentially a movie with no story. What starts out as a road trip movie turns into some bad dada-esque, head trip.

Carol and Maureen, two sexy and carefree girls, are hanging out in Florida out in a field near the highway. Along comes Chuck, a good-looking California surfer stud whose driving a RV (they were called mobile homes back then). He offers them a ride and they can't resist. Carol takes to Chuck immediately and flirts with him while they travel. Meanwhile, in the back of the trailer, the dark and mysterious Maureen is deep into her tarot cards and astrology. She's foreseeing danger ahead.

Instead of any real kind of story, what we get is Chuck and Carol running naked through a field and having lots of sex while Maureen looks on envious of the couple. But then eventually she gets her turn with the stud too. Interspersed in all this sex is lots of trippy, psychedelic imagery, groovy music, nude women, sinister clowns and other confusion. It's perfect for a drive-in where hardly anyone is paying attention anyway cuz most of the audience was making out or socializing or a lot of stoners will get a trip watching. Otherwise, this is a complete waste of time unless you want to catch some T&A.
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not easy to sit through at the Drive-in or your couch.
Wouldyabelieve24 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Picked up Drive-In Cult Classics and this is the first movie I watched. The movie started off with the potential for an interesting psycho-type adventure. Instead, as mentioned in another review, the movie gets pretty disjointed awfully fast.

Two very attractive women (girls) are pick-up by a dude who is driving a bus which is really a mobile home. They get lost in the everglades and start to experience some weird stuff. Flashbacks and psychic experiences start to make the movie uneven to watch. The ending is consistent with the rest of the movie.

Plenty of gratuitous nudity which back in 1975 I probably appreciated.
9 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Leaves Quite a Bit to the Imagination
Uriah4328 January 2014
While driving a mobile home from Miami to Tallahassee a young man by the name of "Chuck" (Alan Long) stops to offer a ride to two female hippies by the name of "Carol" (Jill Senter) and "Maureen" (Gini Eastwood). Of the two, Carol is more free-spirited while Maureen is introverted and involved in the occult. Because of this, Maureen gets bad vibes and advises Carol that traveling with Chuck is dangerous. But Carol manages to persuade Maureen to accept the invitation all the same. Sure enough, they end up stuck in a swamp. From this point on the viewer is shown a series of flashbacks, hallucinations and visions from all three characters which eventually ends in the same bizarre manner in which they began. At any rate, rather than disclosing anything more I will just say that this was a low-budget exploitation film that leaves quite a bit to the imagination. Obviously, it was intended to be somewhat artistic and it succeeds to a certain degree. Unfortunately,some of the scenarios should have offered more clues to their overall symbolism. For example, in one scene there is a clown with balloons who at first amuses Maureen and when he takes off the mask terrifies her. But who or what the clown represents isn't made clear and the viewers are apparently forced to come up with the answers on their own. The ending is also something of a puzzle. Because of this the entire film suffers in translation and I rate it as below average.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
exploitation hippie drive-in movie
SnoopyStyle13 July 2015
Hippie chicks Carol and Maureen get a ride from Chuck in his bus turned Mobile Home. Maureen predicts it's gonna be a bad trip because of his sign and the stars. Chuck is delivering the bus to Tallahassee but gets lost in the Florida Everglades. Maureen feels drawn to an altar in the swamp.

The actors mumble through their lines, not that any of the dialog is anything to write home about. The characters are bad. The story is worst. The whole thing is amateurish. It's a hippie mind trip for the exploitation drive-in crowd that titillates with some nudity. It may have some artistic pretensions but it is almost unwatchable.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
mystical hippie sexploitation melodrama is all over the place
OldAle125 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
A couple of attractive young ladies lie in the tall grass by the side of a road. Handsome blonde hippie-type Chuck (Alan Long) stops his RV and offers them a ride. Dark, slightly exotic Maureen (Gini Eastwood) warns freer-spirited Carol (Jill Senter) that no good will come of this, as Chuck is an Aries...

So begins the bizarre mystical/sexploitation/hippie melodrama Pick-up, one of the stranger and most unplaceable films I've seen in a while. Chuck and Carol develop an attachment pretty quickly, Carol flirts with him and flashes a group of horny guys in a pickup truck that passes them....Chuck's driving the RV through Florida to Tallahassee and communicates with an irritable manager on the phone...Maureen does Tarot in the back and seems pensive. Eventually they get lost and the RV gets stuck in a swampy area, where the bulk of the film takes place. None of the characters seems to worry too much about getting out of being stuck, or getting anywhere in particular though Chuck is under contract. They're carefree, you know? Alternating odd and seemingly random flashbacks to the earlier lives of all three characters, Maureen's mystic pagan religious revelations, and Carol and Chuck's uninhibited lovemaking, this is a bizarre mesh of "art" film elements, exploitation, and really quite gorgeous scenic nature photography courtesy of director/cinematographer Hirschenson. After a while I basically stopped caring about what was happening, because none of it really mattered very much. It's nice to look at, both leading ladies are very cute and very naked much of the time, and the ending is pretty bizarre and nonsensical. This must have mystified most drive-in audiences; what the aims of the filmmakers were, I really couldn't tell you. Sit back, fire one up, and dig it, man.
8 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pick Up
Scarecrow-8820 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
A young man is transporting a lavish bus across Florida to a specific destination, picking up two female oddballs from California, getting lost and trapped within the Everglades swamp after a detour sends him off route.

The remainder of the film details the trio, how both girls enter sexual relations with their male transporter. We also see inside the psychology of all three. How astrology spiritualist Maureen(Gini Eastwood), rambling on about Pazuzu and the goddess Apollos, was molested by her Catholic priest. A look at Carol's(Jill Senter) first sexual experience. Or, how living in an oppressive environment with his domineering, demanding, overbearing mother shaped Chuck(Alan Long)into the free-spirit he soon become. Each character has reasons for the type of person they are.

Carol, with all of her expressive sensuality, seems to have stopped maturing psychologically at the age of 13. Carol takes to this tiger doll as if it's real, chatting and toying with it as if she were an adolescent.

Chuck just doesn't adhere to the pressures exhibited across the phone from his employer(Tom Quinn)who pleads with him to get the bus to it's desired location on time. Chuck's past with a mother(..there's a hint of possible incest) seems to have deprived him of pleasures he now seeks after, without a care about societal demand.

Maureen is wrought with troublesome dementia, receiving visits from a clown and politician, not to mention this goddess. There's evidence throughout that practically all we see within the landscape of the enchanting Everglades setting could be a product of Maureen's mind.

This movie is way out there("Woah, far out man")..I would certainly classify / categorize this as "weird cinema", probably deriving from some sort of drug-induced state. A collection of dreams / fantasies culled from the use of some kind of trippy acid. Unlike other films of this type(..if there's a film as oddball as this), director Bernard Hirschenson has serious talent, his cinematography and editing quite impressive despite the enigmatic nature of John Winter's script..there's a kind of power the movie has due to the visual work and alluring location. Injecting an assortment of strange situations and characters(..who may or may not be real, perhaps a product of Maureen's mental state), accompanied by musical interludes, accentuates the dream-like spirit Hirschenson seems to be striving for.

The leads are quite beautiful and Hirschenson's camera worships their every pore. I do forewarn future viewers interested in Pick Up, it's not exactly worried about forwarding a plot to you in the usual fashion, opting instead to leisurely explore the dynamic of relationships and the environment of an otherworldly place.
16 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A pretty worthless exploitation movie
Leofwine_draca22 November 2015
PICK-UP is another worthless exploitation movie from Crown International Pictures, although it's not quite as bad as the last two I watched, CINDY AND DONNA and BLUE MONEY. Unlike those films, PICK-UP has more than a plot, even if by the end it doesn't really make a whole lot of sense.

The storyline involves a couple of hitchhiking girls who accept a ride with a guy in a camper van. Before long the trio find themselves lost in the Florida Everglades where they have to put up with madness and the machinations of nature for company. Being a skinflick, there's copious nudity here involving characters randomly running naked through the woods, along with some sleazy flashback scenes of a character being molested by a perverted priest.

There are also some mild horror elements as the characters take drugs and suffer some bizarre hallucinations, and there's a horror climax of sorts involving black magic. It's all very cheap and silly, though, with very bad acting and production values, thus without much reason to tune in.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Wanna go for a ride?...YES PLEASE!
cdman98765432131 July 2007
What can I said about "Pick-Up" that hasn't been said already? It's sad to see the negatives that were posted on here about the movie....how about you think outside the box?

Anyways, another reviewer pretty much told you what the film was about, so I won't repeat that here. What I will tell you is the film is just great. The film is obviously low budget...but not in a bad way whatsoever! They made with what they had...the acting (for that time), was very good, the directing was great, and I would just like to point out the editing...excellent! You know, back then it wasn't easy like it is now, and there's some trippy stuff you see in between shots as well. Oh, and both of the girls...absolutely beautiful.

The film, like one reviewer said, plays like a "trip"....and I absolutely gotta agree with them! Definitely a trip I would love to be on that's for sure. I WILL NOT give away the ending, but to this day it's stuck with me and I always think about it. The pacing is great, both of the girls are excellent (as characters and actresses)...the guy that owns the RV place always cracks me up lol

Seriously though, the other reviewer did a top notch job, and I can't think of anything else to say other than this:

Want to see a film that is original and unlike any other film you have seen? Tired of the films that try and pass as "grindhouse" films nowadays and want the real thing? Pick up "PICK-UP" today and go on one hell of a ride =)

But to agree with one of the other reviewers....YES!!! This, if no other movie, needs a special edition!!!!
82 out of 94 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Poor Classification By the Market Draws the Audience into a Trap of a Deeper Film
aczilla-18 April 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Bernard Hirschenson was an artist first and a filmmaker second, and I can say with certainty that he deserves respect for his cinematography and editing skill. I have yet to see the film market categorize Pick-Up properly for what it is: outside the realm of your average drive-in experience. It's been called grind-house and soft-core, but the only description that fits is drive-in. The typical drive-in movie, on its surface, had as much legroom as the Dodge Dart parked in front of it and packed with teenagers, but quite a few drive-in movies dug deeper to defy classification. Pick-Up fits almost every existentialist argument and moral dilemma known to man into a story where essentially nothing happens (in the plot, that is, because your eyes cannot deny there is quite a lot happening). The only conveyed conflict comes after the opening when our stars are stranded in the Everglades. Then things get weird, but how weird is ultimately up to the viewer.

Carol and Maureen hitchhike with Chuck, who is driving a passenger bus converted into a mobile home. Their first glimpse of him is stopping by the side of the road to take a leak, so it seems pretty clear right away that these girls are stunning judges of character. Hey, it's the '70s! Don't be so uptight. A hurricane knocks out a road sign, and a wrong turn finds the bus stuck in the swamp. Carol and Chuck then spend the majority of the time joined at the hips and romping naked in the foliage. I always found something unsettling about this Garden of Eden motif because I am concerned about how many micro bacteria and parasites these performers had to endure in their private parts to make a movie. Watch virtually any Russ Meyer film, where a buxom naked star rolls around a muddy shore littered with debris from the current, and tell me it doesn't send a chill down your spine.

You almost find yourself believing that this is the only real point: good-looking naked people indulging in nature. That's basically what any plot synopsis gives you. That's what Mill Creek Entertainment's Drive-In Cult Classics 32-movie set gave me. That's the synopsis that IMDb gives, but it is drawing you into the trap. Enter Maureen. Vacant-eyed, chanting strange phrases sometimes difficult to distinguish from actual speech, and immersed in tarot cards and astrological signs, Maureen is a quicksand pit of emotional turmoil. While Carol and Chuck slosh in the germ-ridden flora, Maureen is sitting in the bus and staring into space, taking the audience on a mental journey consisting purely of metaphor. She begins this ride by wandering into the swamp and finding a sacrificial stone altar. A woman in a white robe appears, telling Maureen to accept the Scepter of Apollo. Maureen accepts it in more ways than one by writhing naked on the altar for a few minutes. The audience is then subjected to a multitude of images, metaphors, and flashbacks that seek to explain why Maureen is disturbed as well as how Carol and Chuck began their own prospective journeys. Describing these situations would be the spoilers of the film, so, without giving away any details, I'll just say all three of them suffered from the top-tier confusions of any young person being thrust into adulthood: religion, politics, overbearing parents, mistrust and/or betrayal of authority figures, and hormones. How these images are conveyed must be experienced to grant you any real understanding of what might be happening in these young people's lives. Maureen eventually finds herself sinking so deep that she turns to self-mutilation, forcing Chuck to attempt to understand her in coming to her aid. He subtly avoided Maureen as much as possible by spending time with free-spirited Carol. Carol is easy and Chuck is simple until the more complicated Maureen displays a quality of real distress that turns his attention.

It sounds simple, but Pick-Up displays these situations through elaborate editing. At times, the only way to know what is real is that these young people are in the middle of nowhere and waiting for Chuck's boss, a jarring presence on the bus's mobile phone, to try to locate them. Maureen's use of paganism to combat religious symbols might lead one to think the boss is God himself, interrupting to ask questions to which only He knows the answer because the audience is given no glimpse into where His conversation began. We don't know Chuck's relationship with him, and the boss seems to be the only connection to the civilized world as Chuck, Carol and Maureen question their desire to return to that world at all.

What stands out most to me is how much is open to interpretation. You walk in with the basics of an R-rated mid-70s drive-in movie: good-looking people take their clothes off and do things in front of the camera while "peace and love" act as the subliminal message, but then you take a detour into metaphysics and have to look for clues to remind you what is reality. I have seen reviews that claim this film was not made for a sober audience, but the film itself is sobering. I would wager anyone watching this movie on drugs at the time suffered a bit of a freak-out. Yes, some scenes play out like what I am to believe an acid trip is supposed to resemble, but I find it hard to believe anyone under the influence could watch this without having a few walls shattered. Perhaps I read too deeply into the symbolism in this film, but that is part of its beauty. Anyone is welcome to make as much or as little about anything, applying different meanings to each of the symbols the film throws at them. There is little doubt, however, even with the distractions of bare bodies, that anyone can walk away from Pick-Up without wondering what really happened between these three young people in the swamp.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwn.
Arisdoddle22 July 2018
This looks like the sort of thing horny pre-internet(and pre VCR, for that matter) teenagers who couldn't access real pr0n might use for "inspiration". That's entirely the long and short of it.

The people who are proclaimng this "The best movie evah!" WERE those teenagers.

End-of-story!
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The GREATEST flick....... EVER.
the_blue_dot12 July 2006
I gotta be straight up and just tell anyone reading this that PICK-UP is a favorite film of mine. The movie (in it's most basic sense) deals with two hippie chicks (both hot as hell by the way) who hitch a ride across Florida with a cool hippie dude. They take a detour and ultimately find themselves lost and stranded out in the Florida Everglades (props to the actors for dealing with what had to be miserable conditions out in those swamps).... Anyway.... Once out in the swamps you get lots of sex and nudity as well as a bunch of odd flashback sequences that give hints as to who the characters are etc.... I won't go into any further details because like a 'dream' or a 'trip'... It's best to just 'experience' THE experience... There's lots of stuff going on for the viewer to try to interpret if they so choose... Anyway....

In closing.... PICK-UP is incredibly difficult to get hold of but it's worth the search and is highly recommended to fans of trippy/weird/surreal type flicks as well as fans of early 70's exploitation.

This flick NEEDS a special edition DVD release!!!!!!!!!!!!!
112 out of 127 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Keep the fast-forward button handy
jfgibson733 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The story involves three hippies taking a bus across Florida, most likely traveling along I-75. They get stuck and use the time to enjoy nature and each other.

To enjoy a movie, you generally have to be willing to overlook some of the ways in which they stretch the truth (it's called suspension of disbelief). Some movies, like Raiders of the Lost Ark, are so much fun that you don't care that there is no way a human could take that much punishment, or you don't notice how many rounds the six shooter holds. Well, in this movie, there was one huge distraction I could not get over: You can NOT go for naked romps through the Everglades. There are alligators, bears, venomous snakes, insects (fire ants), and panthers (maybe only 20 or so nowadays). What's more, these animals were surely more abundant 30 years ago when there was more available habitat. They find a baby raccoon in a tree, pick it up, stroke it, and kiss it. Rabies, anyone? When they get hungry, the male hippie decides, "Let's go boar hunting!" and moments later, he creeps up to within 10 feet of a razorback, in plain sight. Lucky he had that compound bow on the bus.

Most of the movie consists of easy-listening music playing as the guy rolls around the swamp with Carol, while Maureen has dark visions and flashbacks. It is done in a surreal, dream-like way, and is fairly well-photographed. The audio, however, is mixed lower than the incidental music in some scenes, making it sound more like background ambiance than dialog.

In this part of Florida, even now, it isn't safe to explore undeveloped areas. So it was jaw-dropping to see these kids hanging from trees, swimming in ponds (the water would actually be brackish, not crystal clear), and rolling on the ground.
6 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Weird and also rather boring
The_Void6 April 2008
Pick-Up is a film that relies on its visuals and atmosphere rather than a plot, and the results are really not all that good. To its credit, the film does achieve what it sets out to; as it all looks very nice indeed and director Bernard Hirschenson completely succeeds in creating a trippy and surreal atmosphere. However, the film on the whole is not a big success as without a plot to rely on, it's all rather dull. The premise of the film simply focuses on two hippy chicks named Carol and Maureen who go off into the Florida everglades, hitch a lift and end up getting into all sorts of weird stuff. The film is sometimes professed to be a Grindhouse flick; this is totally not the case as the film really doesn't have any kind of edge to it. If you enjoy watching people float about pretentiously, you might get some enjoyment out of this; personally the only thing I liked about it was a handful of visuals and it's hardly enough to say that the whole film is a success. I'm actually struggling for things to say about it as the film is not very meaty. Overall, this might please some people; but it didn't do much for me.
11 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Plot less and strange.
TOMNEL19 January 2009
Pick-up is a low budget 70s sexploitation film, and what is one to expect from a 70s sexploitation film but a mildly entertaining plot and a lot of sex. Well, though the latter was featured quite prominently, it is very hard to nit pick the story, as there is none to be seen. This is no more than a random trip in a bus with a guy and two girls, and the crazy happenings that go on.

Two hippie chicks, Carol (Jill Senter) and Maureen (Gini Eastwood), are meditating in a field, meet a crazy hippie guy, Chuck (Alan Long), who has this nifty bus. They go on what seems to be a spiritual adventure involving seeing things that aren't there, and running around naked through a field. The climax of the film is so mind blowingly stupid, you wouldn't believe someone actually penned this awful "story"(?).

The main problem with the movie is it makes no sense, and has no story. At least if it had a nonsensical story that would be something, but this movie just doesn't try to tell us anything. It's just about some young people and their sexy naked adventures. At times, this movie can be extremely slow too, and it gets boring. It seems the only reason anyone would enjoy this film, is for it's large quantities of nudity and sexuality, but even that can't keep people interested through the many lulls.

This is a fun flick if you like bad '70s cinema, but otherwise avoid this strange and silly movie.

My rating: * out of ****. 75 mins. R for nudity/sexuality, and language.
7 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
ARIES IS IN TURBULENCE
nogodnomasters27 May 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Two young ladies standing in a field by a road get picked up by Chuck (Alan Long) who is driving a converted bus. The girls consist of Maureen (Gini Eastwood) who is into astrology, Rider Back Tarot cards, getting naked and becoming the High Priestess of Apollo fighting Pazuzu. Never mind that they mix mythologies. Carol (Jill Senter) enjoys smoking pot, flashing, getting naked, and having sex.

AS fate would have it, the bus must take a detour and gets lost and stuck in the Everglades where our threesome can frolic, flashback, and hallucinate clowns with balloons. This is a low budget 70's drive-in movie with very little plot. It is a movie designed for young teens to watch while smoking pot, get aroused and slip into the back seat for some action. I mean seriously, why else would anyone watch it?

Parental Guide : No f-bombs. Sex and nudity (Gini Eastwood, Jill Senter, Alan Long-rear)
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
And the point is?
Coventry12 February 2022
"Pick-Up" is sort of like a drug-movie, but without the drugs. In case you are heavily into trippy and psychedelic 60s/70s exploitation movies, you are likely to find it a very enjoyable and worthwhile effort.

A good 15-20 years ago, I probably also would have loved it, but as a skeptical and grumpy 40-something geezer, I just keep wondering what the point is of it all. Yes, the two female lead stars (Jill Senter and Gini Eastwood) are incredibly hot and I don't mind they are stark-naked most of the running time, but even staring at their perfectly shaped breasts and bums becomes boring pretty quick.

Nothing in this whole film makes any sense, starting with the two girls themselves. They are so different they shouldn't even be friends. Maureen is a dreamy nympho, while Carol is an uptight meditator. If two opposite characters like this would seriously go on a road-trip together, they'd kill each other after one, for sure. Anyhow, they are picked up by a guy named Chuck, who's driving an RV from Miami to Tallahassee, and get lost in the Everglades following a non-existent tropical storm. There's a little bit of black magic, a giant swing, and a creepy clown with balloons, but please don't ask me how all this connects, because I didn't understand one iota of it (and, presumably, it isn't even meant to make sense).
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not entirely brilliant, but definitely entirely original
happyendingrocks15 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This perplexing oddity almost defies description, and though I'm finding myself at a loss when I try to sum it up, I'll give it my best shot.

The sparse story follows the brief journey of Carol and Maureen, two attractive free-spirits who hitch a ride on a mobile home bus with the vehicle's shaggy-haired driver, Chuck. Closed roads force them to take a back country detour, upon which the bus gets stuck in the mud in the heart of a desolate swampland. Trapped in this secluded locale, the trio embark on a mystifying head trip, during which Carol and Chuck frolic naked for most of the film, while Maureen takes a much less cheery internal journey after she is visited by an emissary of the ancient god Apollo, which prompts her to strip nude and writhe on top of an altar. Maureen's behavior becomes increasingly erratic, and by the time she experiences a bizarre hallucination in which she is menaced by a portly clown wearing what looks to be a modified Richard Nixon mask, we get a very clear sense that something is vexing her.

Though presented to us as close companions, Carol and Maureen are decidedly disparate characters; the former is a bubbly sexpot with a passion for joints and indiscriminate intercourse in trees, while the latter is a morose misanthrope who spends most of the movie brooding, offering astrological predictions, and reading Tarot cards. Chuck, for his part, is a laid-back lad who strikes a balance between both of those opposites, though he definitely spends a lot more time indulging in the indiscriminate treetop intercourse than he does checking his horoscope.

Pick-Up is decidedly more art-house than grind-house, and despite its obtuse presentation, there's no denying it's a beautifully crafted film. The utilization of dizzying edits and disorienting camera angles presents an excellent visual accompaniment to the often confusing narrative, and subtle touches like muting the images by over-exposing the film during Maureen's sprawling trances display her dream-like mindset in a creative fashion.

The film offers little more than a snapshot of one day in these characters' lives, yet we are ultimately given a deep exploration of all three. Each of them is afforded only a single flashback to explain the circumstances that shaped their intersecting paths, but these solitary glimpses go a long way toward revealing who they are. Perhaps predictably, Maureen's back-story is the most shocking of the bunch, and once we know the source of her demons, her sour, dark demeanor makes perfect sense.

Despite the obscurity of the cast, all three principles deliver deceptively nuanced performances. Director Bernard Hirschenson is obviously employing methods cribbed straight out of his film school textbooks, but his adept weaving of often confusing images into a satisfying whole may remind studious viewers of the work of David Lynch.

Even though Pick-Up offers up ample displays of nudity, very little of the surreal material here is likely to excite devoted grind-house enthusiasts expecting a pure exploitation vehicle. However, the stunning twist that concludes the tale ends Pick-Up on a haunting note that elevates the entire film, and makes sense out of even the most nonsensical elements of the story. After this reveal, the mirthful celebration of reckless hedonism becomes something far more cerebral, and the unsettling feeling the film leaves behind as the credits roll is a nicely orchestrated punctuation mark.

This trippy exercise is certainly tedious and baffling at times, but the end result is a surprisingly shocking and indelible film. I can honestly say that I've never seen anything quite like this, so for better or worse, Pick-Up can not be easily dismissed or forgotten.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A totally groovy one-of-a-kind 70's exploitation cinematic head trip
Woodyanders29 June 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Flighty, easygoing Carol (yummy Jill Senter) and her intense, brooding friend Maureen (the equally tasty Gini Eastwood) hitch a ride from groovy hippie dude Chuck (affable, shaggy-haired Alan Long) in his nifty mobile home bus. The trio find themselves lost in the Florida Everglades following a fierce rainstorm and embark on a startling spiritual journey of self-discovery in which they have bizarre encounters with a rowdy bunch of whooping rednecks in a pick-up truck, a black woman wearing a flowing white robe, a smarmy politician, and a creepy clown clutching a handful of balloons. Director/editor/producer/cinematographer Bernie Hirschenson (who also shot and directed countless TV commercials in the 70's), working from a brilliantly weird script by John Winter, relates the arrestingly loosey-goosey free-form narrative at a rambling, yet steady pace and does an expert job of creating a marvelously trippy and surreal hallucinatory vibe. Moreover, Hirschenson certainly doesn't skimp on either the steamy nudity or hot soft-core sex scenes. The attractive brunette female leads deliver appealingly natural performances and look absolutely spectacular in their birthday suits. Hirschenson's bright, dewy, sunny cinematography, the spooky flashbacks into the characters' troubled pasts (Maureen does the dirty deed with a lecherous pervert priest!), lots of heavy mystical astrological mumbo jumbo, the mellow, harmonic score by Patrick Adams and Michael Rod, and the breathtaking swampland scenery further enhance the fabulously far-out strangeness of this gloriously idiosyncratic one-of-a-kind 70's exploitation movie head trip.
90 out of 104 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
a true-blue drive-in flick
Quinoa19846 November 2008
Being a drive-in flick is something that carries as much plot as an empty garbage can, something light and crude enough so that the boy watching with the girl in the car can be distracted enough to work his way up just a little more up her skirt. Certainly the atmosphere is encouraging: it's about two hippies who hitchhike and get picked up by another hippie driving a van to Talahassee (as we only know cause of the "plot device" of the guy-hippie's boss repeatedly calling on the mobile-phone) and then he gets somewhat intentionally stuck in the swamp. The rest of the movie contains flashbacks and sex scenes, and some moments where "dialog" takes place- in quotes for the fact that most of it is incredulous stuff that only passes once or twice as real conversation or thought.

Maybe I'm a little too hard on this though; Pick-up is, actually, a surprisingly engaging soft-core hippie-spoliation picture. A lot of it can be attributable to the director/photographer Bernard Hirschhenson, who took a look at the script and the producers and probably said, "Fine, I'll do it, but..." and the but turned into a quasi-documentary on the steamy, dark and nature-full quarters of the Florida swamps. Matter of fact, Florida is a kind of character here- in the Terence Malick kind of way- this in spite the fact that the director sometimes goes to lengths to exploit the locations as much as the copulating actors. In many of these scenes- including the first one when Chuck and, uh, the girl who's more happy-go-lucky and sexually liberated walk away from the mobile and just walk in a drug-fueled daze in the swamp- the camera takes on a quality that almost, just almost, makes it captivating.

But then the "plot" has to come back into play, which is close to non-existent except for the whole facet of tarot cards and astrology and sexual abuse working its way into one of the female characters (the one with the dark hair and glazed look, Carol I think), and it starts to really get dull fast. How dull is accentuated by what is at first interesting in that Zardoz kind of manner and then devolves into the bad film-school thing of "depth" coming from an alter and religious and political symbolism (yes, political, there's an excruciating scene where a gay senator comes to call at the bus to get votes), and it reminded me of the "film" being directed by Howard Stern when he was at college in Private Parts.

So much of this is so dumb and going-nowhere storytelling and plodding around I should say it's a bad movie... and yet I can't really. I didn't want to turn it off because of something that could happen, or might happen with these freaky-deaky hippies (the women, I might add, quite the striking-looking types), and the cinematography is far beyond the call of anything else of its kind. Maybe not Russ Meyer, but it'll do. And, hell help me, there's some moments of real trashy fun amid the muck of 'whatever/sex/drugs'-ness on the whole.
8 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An Interesting 70s Sleaze Film
corbidun29 January 2019
This is a rather odd film. It's incredibly low budget and won't be for everyone with it's offbeat plot and excessive sexual content, but if you like real exploitation cinema (not just horror films made in the 70s marketed as "Grindhouse") you will love this film.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
You won't have seen a film quite like this before
christopher-underwood19 September 2007
Wow! I'm just a sucker for stuff like this. A real trippy trip and a real surprise. I was expecting crap camera-work, crap acting and silly story comprising a decent little, grind house piece of sleaze. But no, someone had genuine aspirations here and if it doesn't completely come off, it is certainly a super, one off of a movie that manages to encapsulate a brief moment in western youth culture. But leaving aside any seriousness this is such a great movie to watch with such super widescreen cinematography. Two girls and a guy and a converted bus are cavorting their way to deliver the said auto when they end up lost in the Everglades and just decide to enjoy themselves. Bright, cheery, sexy, yes maybe a little pretentious but it has such a glow about it that it would be churlish to complain. Just when I was beginning to wonder if this was going anywhere at all there is a most impressive burst of violence and it's over. You won't have seen a film quite like this before.
72 out of 83 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed