Inspector Gadget's Last Case: Claw's Revenge (TV Movie 2002) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
We'll Make a Decent Movie Next Time, Gadget! Next Time!
Kryptoncat28 August 2012
Warning: Spoilers
(Spoilers below.)

This is not a horrible movie. It's also not an awful adaptation of the series. It is, however, a half-baked excuse for a plot and a waste of what should have been fun (and funny) characters.

Here's the plot: Gadget and Gadgetmobile are best buds, but they have a falling out after the chief fires Gadgetmobile for breaking down in his office; and Gadget gets a new police car, R2K. Gadgetmobile is sold to another superhero, Devon Debonair, who is actually Dr. Claw in disguise. Debonair causes Gadget to lose his job. Gadgetmobile breaks out of Claw's lair with the help of two other cars he befriended in the car lot, and he and Gadget reunite to capture the M.A.D. Agents after Claw escapes.

Most of this movie is just underwritten drama between Gadget and his car. The beginning of the movie was actually pretty promising; Gadget was competent, Gadgetmobile's personality was more low-keyed than in the live-action film, their friendship was shown nicely, and the action was pretty good! Then the main plot kicked in. And by 'kicked in' I mean 'fiddled with its keys for a good twenty minutes before slowly stumbling through the door.' The drama between these two characters was not written well enough to keep this movie rolling. It was boring, had padding, and the good scenes and witty lines were spaced far and in between.

The main conflict of the movie, Gadget and Gadgetmobile's break-up, just didn't really make sense to me. Sentient cars have jobs, but can also be sold? Why couldn't Gadget keep his car after it was fired; was Gadgetmobile never really his in the first place? (I guess not, because when R2K bailed on Gadget at the end; Gadget had to take a taxi.) Well that's just great; he's a world famous detective, but he doesn't own a car. Right.

Anyway, this quasi-slavery aspect is never really addressed. Gadgetmobile just feels sad and betrayed after he's fired from the police and sold to a car lot, believing Gadget likes R2K better. Gadget tries to get Gadgetmobile back after he realizes what happened, but finds Gadgetmobile's already been sold. The relationship between these two characters is really uncomfortable because the movie wants us to see Gadgetmobile as both a member of Gadget's family and a thing Gadget owns, and the morality of the situation is never delved into. The drama they have before and after they part ways drags on too long with few engaging scenes for a good portion of the movie.

(There is one scene that had potential: Gadget told a car that Gadgetmobile didn't actually have a heart, he was just mechanical; and the car countered that by saying, "You're mechanical, don't you have a heart?" Then the scene ends. Do more than just graze the surface, movie!) Aside from the messy breakup between Gadget and his car, you have Dr. Claw, who is neither menacing nor funny in this movie. The scenes with his agents aren't that good either. They wasted a great villain. Moving on.

Chief Quimby, what did they do to you? Gadget put him through a lot in the original series, and yet Quimby still valued him as a friend. Quimby was likable. However, he hates Gadget in this movie, even though this is probably the most competent Gadget has ever been! Quimby also thinks just because Debonair is out saving the day, that must mean Gadget is not doing his job. Quimby seriously threatens to fire Gadget just because Debonair got to the crime scene first in one case; and because the bad guy incapacitated Gadget in another case. Do you also fire your other police officers when they arrive after a crime has been committed, or if they get hurt on the job, Chief? Didn't think so. This movie portrays Quimby as a complete jerk. Having two major crimefighters in your city is not a bad thing. On that note, the scenes with the news casters bashing Gadget and praising Debonair are just tiresome and redundant.

Gadget himself was fine in this movie; he was as always goofy and lovable, but a lot more competent. It was a nice balance. Gadgetmobile was O.K., too. If these characters were given more stuff to do besides hang on to the lifeless plot, this movie would have been great. For instance, Gadget actually using his gadgets more often, maybe? More exciting and funny action scenes with witty dialogue? Maybe some involvement from Penny and Brain? Oh yes. I haven't mentioned them so far in this review, but they sure were in this movie... fifteen minutes of screen time, tops. Seriously movie, Penny and Brain are awesome characters and you barely even used them. Why? There are two other sentient cars who feature prominently in this film; they befriend Gadgetmobile and came to his rescue at the end. They aren't badly written, just kind of bland, and the fact that they upstage the Gadget family at the end does not do the movie any good. (R2K, the fourth sentient vehicle, is uninteresting also.) During the very last ten minutes, the movie realizes it needs to end sometime, so we finally get to see Penny and Brain do their shtick and have a resolution between Gadgetmobile and Gadget. This is horrible pacing, and causes the entire ending of the movie to feel rushed and flat.

In short, this movie was poorly plotted and badly paced. The characters were either underused or handled improperly. The sentient cars being sold aspect shouldn't have even been in the movie if the characters can't even realize the cars were basically slaves. (See Star Wars for how to handle something like that properly so that it makes sense and is appropriate for kid viewers.) Some things in this movie had potential, but unfortunately it was just not meant to be. Go Go Gadget Sadness.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Nothing too spectacular
blumdeluxe22 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
"Inspector Gadget's last case" is a late addition to the Inspector Gadget series. In it, Gadget and his car are going through rough times when he gives up on his old Mobil, which is bought by the new but shady rising star of the investigator scene in town. Will anyone be able to stop the physically transformed criminals and the evil Dr. Claw?

I am not really an expert when it comes to Inspector Gadget, in fact this is the first film of him that I ever saw, as far as I can remember. Thus, I can not say if the movie fits into the series, I will focus on it as an independent piece. Unfortunately, a lot of the times the gags are not really working. Some of them are so old that it's hard to bear (Yellow Snow.. giggles). The plot itself is not bad, even though it is highly predictable. Still the film doesn't get boring and although I found Gadget quite rude, I am sure that some children will be able to identify with parts of the script. Some of the jokes they won't understand, because there are some references especially for adult viewers but there are surely worse movies for children.

All in all I am not really convinced, though. It was a nice watch, not more, and I don't see myself watching this a second time.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
go go gadget malfunction
nightwing500018 December 2015
Warning: Spoilers
this movie is awful! just awful! after this movie the show would be called gadget and the gadgetinis! can you believe this! gadget isn't even an inspector anymore! THE NAME OF THE CHARACTER IS NOT GADGET! IT'S INSPECTOR GADGET! and the theme song for the show that will come after this movie is not catchy at all! now there are some good parts but their just overshadowed by the bad moments! inspector gadget's last case: claws revenge. go go gadget malfunction. and if your wondering how i think of the movie that promoted this bad movie (which is inspector gadget 2) yeah don't even get me started on that one because trust me if you want to see a good inspector gadget movie go watch inspector gadget saves Christmas it's a lot more better than this.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Go- go- Gadget !
sokath3 January 2003
This film essentially deals with Inspector Gadget's arch-nemesis Doctor Claw who has returned after many years to the now-peaceful city of Metropolis. Claw's plan is to foil Gadget once and for all by using a newer "cooler" crimefighter to help destroy Gadget's popularity. Sadly the film fails miserably, the series was great, but it was revived nearly 20 years later with tragic results. Without the voice of Don Adams as Inspector Gadget it just doesn't cut it anymore; Dr. Claw is not only visually less frightening, but sounds more like a wrestler with a cold, than his original intimidating self. Granted this is a children's movie, but the plot is so painfully weak (heaven forbid I mention the animation) that it pales in comparison to the original series. Someone has decided to updated Penny as well to bring her two decades up to speed, she now has some quasi-punk rebellious clothing style and doesn't play half the role that she did in the TV series. The Gadgetmobile talks, as well as including a plot angle that focuses entire ON talking cars. Maybe I'm just a kid who loved the show who's grown up jaded, but I thought that the live-action version was more pain than I could bear, but now they go and spring this complete watering-down of the quality TV series on us. It's more than I can take.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Utterly plot-less
CuriosityKilledShawn7 October 2005
My namesake spent about 15 years in the wild before this terrible 2002 made-for-video effort came along, following the 2001 Gadget and the Gadgetinis show, which wasn't half bad. While it may have a bright color pallet I can't believe that in 2002 they decided to animate this in the old 1.33:1 aspect ratio and master it for VHS consumption. It's like DIC Entertainment and Nickelodeon were completely clueless about the rapidly changing nature of home video and media consumption. Also, there's too much of the formula missing which bog this Gadget right down the toilet.

First of all the classic Inspector Gadget theme song and music is completely absent. Spongebob Squarepants composer and Patrick Stewart/Jason Voorhees crossbreed Stephen C. Marston tries to compromise by doing a score that sounds similar but it's just not good enough. The Gadget-mobile is now a talking car, not a car that can turn into a van. Plus it looks a lot cuter and rounder instead of being the angular cutting-edge vehicle it used to be. Penny no longer has her computer book and she and her dog Brain hardly make an appearance at all.

The plot is non-existent. There's something about a transformation formula and Doctor Claw using it for some never revealed evil but that's all I got. What the deal was with the short/giant Italian guy I will never know. It had nothing to do with anything.

And if the title is anything to go by, his last case is wrapped up in no way whatsoever, and he stays on the force so why it's called 'last case' is a mystery also.

I wasn't impressed at all. This is an affront to a great animated show. No kid will like or appreciate this and no fan Gadget will be satisfied.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Inspector Gadget was just as I remembered him!
durrant4145@rogers.com15 April 2004
When I was watching INSPECTOR GADGET'S LAST CASE, I felt as if I was nine years old and watching the original series again. Sure, the Gadgetmobile was talking and Dr. Claw had a different voice, but it seemed to me that it was just like the olden days when I would watch INSPECTOR GADGET before leaving for school later on that morning. Claw, by the way, is just as he always was - and you don't see his face except when he is masquerading as Devon Debonair, at which point his face is disguised - remember, he has drunk the special serum, so we still don't know what he really looks like. At all other times he is in his chair with his face hidden from view and now wears a new golden claw. I wonder why his face is always hidden from us?
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Even Penny and Brain Couldn't Save Uncle Gadget This Time
stopthemachine1 June 2006
Inspector Gadget was probably my all-time favorite 80's cartoon. I enjoyed both the first and second seasons of the series as well as 1992's Christmas special "Inspector Gadget Saves Christmas". Some Gadget fans are quick to criticize the second season (1985) of the show, but they need to compare it to DiC's 2002 release of "Inspector Gadget's Last Case: Claw's Revenge" for then, they will find the second season to be absolute gold.

Being a Gadget fan, I couldn't resist the opportunity to see the animated Inspector Gadget in something that wasn't Gadget Boy-related. I purchased the film, and I swore to myself that I'd be objective; I knew that sometimes artistic liberties would be taken from the original series. I was not even prepared for what I was about to watch.

There was barely a shred of the original show still intact.

Here is a short list of just some of the cons for this movie: *The humor is non-existent from the original series.

*Penny and Brain (originally having a nearly equal part in the series as Gadget) are missing from the action for fifteen to twenty minute intervals.

*The original music by Saban & Levy is not there, and the score that exists is sub-par. (Understood that Saban has his own production company now, but at least "Inspector Gadget Saves Christmas" had good music, even without Saban.) *Don't expect to see any of Gadget's gadgets which made the show so endearing, such as gadget-copter, gadget-brella, gadget-mallet,gadget-coat (which actually was used but it was not even called the same thing), as well as his standard other hat and hand gadgets. In this movie, his gadget legs were telescopic instead of springs. That kind of stuff annoys true fans of the show, and simply aren't necessary to change.

*The gadgetmobile from the original series is now a fast-talking, supposedly "hip" convertible. All the fans from the original series enjoyed the gadgetmobile transforming into the gadget van and vice versa.

*Chief Quimby is now very short-tempered and even mean to Gadget. He was always grumpy in the original series, but this pushes the situation a bit much.

*Penny no longer has a computer book.

Are there any positives to this movie? OK, here goes...

*Maurice LaMarche does a good job of taking over for the great Don Adams as Inspector Gadget.

*In one scene, Chief Quimby alludes to an actual villain from the cartoon series: the Great Wambini (classic "Gadget" villain from the second season, voiced by Louis Nye).

Looking for more redeeming factors for this movie? Well, you're out of luck. Life is about making choices and living by those choices. Most situations in life have a purpose even if it is to teach a lesson. The lesson learned here: keep to the original formula! "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." True Gadget fans should steer clear from this movie; you will surely be disappointed.

Hopefully, DiC and Shout! Factory will continue to release more of the original series after the 2006 release of "Inspector Gadget: The Original Series, Volume 1," containing the first 22 episodes of the series. As a true Gadget fan, lover of 80's animation and many of DiC's programs, I urge you the viewer to purchase "Inspector Gadget: The Original Series, Volume 1" and "Inspector Gadget Saves Christmas" DVD's which are excellent and sure to bring back good memories.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
does not come close to the quality of the TV show
disdressed129 January 2008
this animated Inspector Gadget movie is pretty lame.the story is very weak,and there is little action.most of the characters are given little to nothing to do.the movie is mildly entertaining at best,but really doesn't go any where and is pointless.it's watchable but only just and is nowhere near the calibre of the animated TV show from the 80's.it's not a movie that bears repeat viewing,at least in my mind.it's only about 74 minutes long including credits,so i guess that's a good thing.unlike in the TV show,the characters are not worth rooting for here.in the show,you wanted Inspector Gadget to save the day,but there,who really cares?anyway,that's just my opinion.for me Inspector Gadget's Last Case is a disappointing 3/10
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Who Are You Going To Call? Inspector Gadget to the Rescue!
Sylviastel31 July 2018
If you like Inspector Gadget and his cartoons, this film is for you. I was never a fan of the series as a child. It's okay but I prefer an ensemble of characters. This film is about 75 minutes of light-hearted adventure ideal for family viewing especially youngsters. If you enjoy Gadget and his abilities to stop crime, I still thought I heard Don Adams in the voice. Sadly he passed away but the replacement voice does an adequate job here too.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I Liked It!
InspectorGadget324 May 2005
Believe it or not, Inspector Gadget's Last Case is what got me hooked on the whole Gadget thing.

My name is Miriam and I am twelve years old, so obviously I wasn't around when Inspector Gadget was at the top of his career. Sure, I'd heard of him, but I didn't really know him.

While reading, note that I NEVER SAW THE ORIGINAL SERIES (I would if it came on!). This is just about the only Gadget thing I've ever watched (even though I am now obsessed) and I will be focusing on what I liked about it since everyone else is so negative. For all you pessimists, I've got some cons down there, too. =P First off, for a childish sense of humor, you could deem this movie pretty funny. I thought it was, so sue me. I also thought the animation and character designs were good, and I'm also happy there was more Gadget in it, since he's my favorite character. (I do NOT like Penny.) Then there was Claw (his voice was awful, though) and the Madcat; I thought they were done fairly good too. Gadget's idiocy seemed pretty well in place, if not a bit exaggerated (i.e. sucking his hat-hand thing's thumb. Would make a good screen shot, though. =P) Oh, and I liked the song that ran in the credits. Yes, I am strange.

And, like all movies, there are some negatives, too.

Talking cars? What's up with that? You can tell this was aimed at younger boys. That wouldn't bother me quite so much if there wasn't the fact that the cars basically saved the day. I would have much preferred if Penny and Brain had taken their place. And, apparently, Gadget loved his car more than would be called natural. A bit weird, to say the least.

Oh, and the Chief was downright mean to Gadget. I mean, sheesh, yeah, he wasn't always the most cheerful of people, but he didn't HATE Gadget, from what I've read. Like the Inspector, his personality was exaggerated.

Well, that's pretty much all I have to say about this movie. I thought the animation made up for the car-centered plot and that it was overall pretty decent; more so than the live-action Gadget films (butchered, butchered, BUTCHERED!) at least. Maybe I'm just biased because this is what got me into Gadget in the first place, or maybe my mind is twisted, or maybe I'm just odd, but I really liked this movie, even if I'm the oldest it's recommended for.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Will distract young children but offers nothing for the adult looking for a trip down memory lane
bob the moo11 December 2005
While on a routine pursuit in the Gadgetmobile, Inspector Gadget witnesses two of Claw's men take some sort of potion that gives them a sudden growth boost. This information is put to one side as his car goes through emergency engineering to keep him going. However when the pair are both back on the streets they find that the potion is just the start as they have to deal with an Italian stereotype the size of a skyscraper and the presence of a supposed new crime fighting hero in town.

Although I used to watch this as a kid, I can't really remember if it was any good or not and the only thing I can remember was that Gadget played a sort of Wallace to Brain's Gromit. Yes, Penny was always annoying but generally it was quite amusing (I think). With this rather silly plot though, the focus was pretty much on Gadgetmobile and Inspector Gadget, neither of whom are that great here. For most of the plot we have silly gags but not enough of them. In the final third Brain comes into it a bit more and reproduces some of the stuff I remember from my childhood but even then it is very basic and really lacks any wit or invention.

The delivery doesn't help – the characters look good but the backgrounds are roundly poor and the music is constantly "wacky" even when there is nothing of note happening on the screen. The voice work is nothing special but suits the material reasonably well. LaMarche does a good impression of the original; Byrnes is OK and Moss makes for a very modern and feisty Penny. Dobson and White are both really annoying cars but at least Drummond gives good Claw.

Overall this is a very basic film that will do enough to distract the age-group that it is aimed at. However adults looking for a trip down memory lane will be disappointed to find that it is all lacking in fun and laughs and is really just a bit of a cheap rehash in the aftermath of the Hollywood live-action version.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed