This film has no credible information because the film didn't add anything new to already well-spoken conspiracy theories that been surrounding 9/11 since that day. Other previous 9/11 documentaries did a better job explaining these theories a lot better than this film. The film felt like another conspiracy theory documentary with nothing new to say. It was just a lazy film that retells the same old information that other did the research for their documentary. The documentary doesn't even bring any good information. It just talk about the same old things that most conspiracy theories documentary are showing and questioning like: why the pentagon wreckage was so small and show little remains of aircraft or how the World Trade Center might have bombs inside the building and that the plane that crash into it, doesn't like a commercial jet. First off, the pentagon is a fortified building with steel reinforced walls. I found it plausible that only the nose of the plane pierced the building and the rest of the aircraft disintegrated and followed inertia into the hole. Plus, the film only talks about the second floor hole, and not the 90 feet ground floor hole. So the film present it in a misrepresentation matter. Second off, the plane that hit New York was clearly a passenger plane and it indeed crash into the World Trade Center, and the bombs weren't bombs, but the floors collapsing onto each other. Let's note that this film is created in 2004, so it's a bit outdated. There are a lot of documentaries that came after this, that try to answer those questions, and pretty much show that there is no way, the US government could had done an attack like that. It would first be costly, second off, war isn't as profitable as it was in the old days, and third, if the government did do it, do you really think that all those people would cover up a horrible act for so long. NO—somebody will come out. I don't think our government planned 9/11, but perhaps they knew of the terrorist attack ahead and allow it to happen, to gain more power to convince us to give up more freedom for security. Still, it's up to question. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying trust your government! I might be against the idea that the government did 9/11, but no way, believe everything they say. I do know about the government covering up events in the past before, such as the 1964's Gulf of Tonkin incident, the whole Operation Northwoods, the whole pre-knowing of Pearl Harbor, and even the Remember the Main incident. Still, I don't think this documentary did anything to make it stand out. It didn't go to Washington D.C, Pittsburgh, or New York crash sites, and look for the clues. It didn't go to former president Bush or any current or former government figure and dig any question out of them. It didn't go to the military and dig for answer. It didn't even bother getting the firemen that it was supposed to get for the interview. Question, if the fireman that was getting interview, got let go by the firehouse, how come the interview didn't still go on? It seem like a lame excuse to tell why the firemen was unable to show up on camera. The film didn't even left the radio station. It's seem like just one long ad for the radio station, power hour looking for viewers. Most of the film show other people's materials and video footages. I like how they show blurry close up of video tapes that really doesn't show anything and act like there is something there when there isn't. Then it cut back to a talking head that has nothing to do with Sept. 11. Honestly, what credit does this radio host guy David von Kiest has to talk about Sept. 11? He isn't a former government leader, he isn't part of the military, and no way does he have clue what he is talking about. Plus, the film acts like its only purpose is to seek out the truth, but it's so one-sider, it's can't be taken serious. Don't the filmmakers know that there were a lot of confusing information that came out of that day that proves that their conspiracy 'facts' might not hold up with the greater amount of information. Honestly, to solve this conspiracy theory, more than seeing the wreckage by looking at video footage. Why not look for it at its source. Go to New York and Washington and find what happen to the airplane wreckage. If not that, they should go find out find all the people who were on the flight and do the research on their families to find out whether there was actually a plane that consisted of passengers that hit the pentagon and the World Trade Center! If the people don't match or look fake, then it's not a conspiracy theory at all. It's simple like that. Clearly, the planes weren't shot down in the Atlantic, as none of the planes were near it. Duh, movie. If you really want to make a truth video. Then go to Washington D.C or Afghanistan and ask the 'so-called' terrorists. I don't see any of these documentaries going hard on the source. If the government really didn't want us to know that they did it. At less, you would think they would had done a better job. The movie was even reject from some individuals in the 9/11 truth movement due to its outlandish crackpot claims. If this film was reject by some people in the 9/11 truth movement, then you have to see that this movie isn't as clear as it makes it out to be.
5 out of 9 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink