Think theatrical for this one. Six friends and relatives are isolated in country house. They bicker, they matchmake, they fall in love, they have tea, they read or sing, they bicker again. Great acting, and well shot and edited, and there's some nice relationship friction. Though everything is taken a little too far, theatrical rather than realistic. And it's all a bit trivial, I'm afraid, like light theatricals. Then something goes wrong, and they argue more seriously as nerves break and relationships are put under strain. But, it's still six characters isolated in a country house. One can think of analogies: Agatha Christie's And then there were none, but the tension here is somewhat lacking. Everyone is basically nice and one never feels anyone is in very much danger, except through their own foolishness. That being the case, the point of the thing is a little unclear - not comedy, not romance, not slice of life, not really much of a drama. If you focus on the acting, you'll probably find it enjoyable enough.
6 Reviews
Sandip Ray's individuality exposed
suprabhattacharya29 September 2021
A Story Which Could Have Been Better Told...
rupak_speaking19 February 2018
The singular most dominant feel that I had after watching this movie is that this is a tailor-made script for use by Senior Ray's true successor, not his biologic one. Sandip Ray has taken a keen interest in his father's profession and learnt the trade from quite a young age assisting him in various aspects of his late movies, but that is where it all stops. You can learn as much as you can, but you have to have the gift, the magic touch, to match your legendary father which I find always missing in his movies. And there comes Rituparno Ghosh, who could have handled this story by Narayan Gangopadhyay much better and could give it a treatment as good as Satyajit Ray. Sandip tried everything in it, but that magic just has to be created by the director himself, I guess, no matter how good everything else is. A 6/10, a fine story which could have been better told...
One's True Self shows at Times of Difficulty...
Chrysanthepop14 July 2007
Ray excellently tells Narayan Gangopadhyay's story about 6 characters alienated in a mountain forest after an earthquake (or landslide). The characters include Das (Soumitra Chatterjee), his two sons (Sabyasachi Chakravarthy) and (Parambrata Chatterjee), his friend (Dipankar Dey), his daughter in law (Rituporna Sengupta) and her sister (Raima Sen). He cleverly directs and involves both the settings and characters in creating the mood and feel of isolation with minimum use of special effects.
'Nishijapon'(the end of night) can be classified both as a psychological drama and psychological thriller. All seems to go well between the characters in the beginning until the earthquake. From then on, things start to change and secrets are unraveled.
Next to a coherent screenplay and brilliant direction, all actors have given strong performances. Sengupta is amazing. She displays the transformation in her character with ease. Both the Chatterjee's and Dey are brilliant. Sen is superb. Chakravarty is adequate.
All in all, this is a fine thriller/drama that will keep many engaged and it's worth the hours spent.
'Nishijapon'(the end of night) can be classified both as a psychological drama and psychological thriller. All seems to go well between the characters in the beginning until the earthquake. From then on, things start to change and secrets are unraveled.
Next to a coherent screenplay and brilliant direction, all actors have given strong performances. Sengupta is amazing. She displays the transformation in her character with ease. Both the Chatterjee's and Dey are brilliant. Sen is superb. Chakravarty is adequate.
All in all, this is a fine thriller/drama that will keep many engaged and it's worth the hours spent.
Just Awesome!!!
pele_in23 October 2006
Sandeep Ray's movie Nishijapon reminds me of his father, the great Satyajit Ray. The direction, the dialogs and screenplay are on par with late Ray Senior.
The story revolves around a small family and friend get together in Darjeeling. After carefully character development in first half hour and so, what happens next is complex human natures displayed perfectly.
The performance from Sabyasachi and Rituparna are exceptional. Dipankar and Saumitra are already masters in these type of roles - so no complain there. Raima and Parambrata had given a solid performance.
The pace of the movie is perfect. Although I wanted at least 10 minutes more in the end.
Anyway, hats off to Sandeep for a great work.
The story revolves around a small family and friend get together in Darjeeling. After carefully character development in first half hour and so, what happens next is complex human natures displayed perfectly.
The performance from Sabyasachi and Rituparna are exceptional. Dipankar and Saumitra are already masters in these type of roles - so no complain there. Raima and Parambrata had given a solid performance.
The pace of the movie is perfect. Although I wanted at least 10 minutes more in the end.
Anyway, hats off to Sandeep for a great work.
Are we in the wrong century or what?
Zim_Babwe18 September 2007
When I bought this movie, I was under a great expectation from Sandip Ray, as I used to be a devoted admirer of his late legendary father. My other attraction was the stars, like Soumitra Chatterjee, Sabyasachi Chakravarthy, Dipankar Dey and Rituparna Sengupta.
First of all, I would say, it's one of those very interesting Bengali stories with a potential for realistic psychological suspense drama. We should thank Narayan Ganguly for that. Sandip Ray narrates the story quite well, as good as his contemporary Rituparno Ghosh.
The special effects used in the earthquake scene weren't really efficient enough to make it look believable. It looked more like the house has got a poltergeist or something! Furthermore, when everybody jumped out of the bed in panic and rushed downstairs, that moment they were neatly wrapped in their shawls! That was a ridiculous goof.
Let me ask you this. Is Bengali society (and Indian) still in that level that the housewife and her educated enlightened sister work at home almost as slaves, while all male characters sit around giving orders and drinking tea and gobbling snacks and smoking constantly?! Observe how differently they treat two guests, Sunita (female) and Brojen Lahiri (male). Even after the catastrophe, the women continue to pick up debris and supply food and drink until one of them falls on her face!!
Is it still in that level that in case of a childless couple, only the wife gets tested for fertility (and to be blamed)?!
Is it still in that level that even the young characters have no prior experience of outdoor activities like rock climbing/hiking etc or rescue training in a crisis situation, other than chain smoking and reading text books?! Western young men and women probably do that every summer just for fun!
Is it still in that level that people sleep in bed in sharis and sweaters or with outdoor clothes on?! Don't adults find their own separate homes in stead of living with their parents and siblings for ever?! Are we in the wrong century? They didn't look like from 18th century though.
But my main disappointment came from somewhere else. Sandip Ray might have his own reasons for this casting, which he also mentioned in his interviews, but some of the castings felt so wrong and odd. Soumitra Chatterjee didn't have so much task here as can be demanded given his reputation. I always wondered what actually made him such a big star. People say he is a talented actor, especially in stage (live theaters). I have seen almost all his life's works, and there is absolutely no exception in his acting, in my eyes. He plays all the good old men just as the same, with the same verbal tone, with the same accent, with the same gestures. When he plays bad guys, he just sharpens his eyes in addition.
Sabyasachi, Dipankar and Rituparna gave OK performances, though I liked them better in Atmiya Swajan. On the other hand, Parambrata Chatterjee was a complete disaster. Dark shades under his eyes like a drug addict and facial hair that made him look like a lamb, was that intended? He was pathetically uncomfortable! Every time Parambrata is in the scene, the movie comes down to the level of Anjan Chowdhury/Swapan Saha/Sukhen Das's movies. That's a shame! I must say that in the west we may get a wrong impression that these two guys Soumitra and Parambrata are two gay guys, because of their feminine body language, voice, line delivery, hand gestures etc.
Raima Sen's looks and acting totally impressed me, (if we kindly ignore her imperfect Bengali accent). She gave a much better performance than her contemporary Konkona Sen Sharma in "Titli" (2002). She definitely has the lead female star potential and a very sensitive face, like her legendary grandmother. It was hard to believe that Sunita had to consider this stay-home, no-good, gay-looking young man Shyamal as a future life-partner. Just because "he was there available"!! They had absolutely no chemistry together!
I believe it was only Anita who was under stress for long time and had been suppressing her emotions inside her like volcano until the natural disaster triggered the outburst. None of the other characters had any reason for that. Their smoothly running perfect life ended up in 3-4 days' starvation+dehydration+cold, which was responsible for their hallucination and insanity, and that might lead to cannibalism in the long run.
I understand that, it is certainly different to depict the gradual psychological/behavioral transformation of the characters after the chock in hundred pages in the book, than to show it in a more realistic way in a movie in only 140 minutes. Considering that, I would give it 6 stars out of 10.
First of all, I would say, it's one of those very interesting Bengali stories with a potential for realistic psychological suspense drama. We should thank Narayan Ganguly for that. Sandip Ray narrates the story quite well, as good as his contemporary Rituparno Ghosh.
The special effects used in the earthquake scene weren't really efficient enough to make it look believable. It looked more like the house has got a poltergeist or something! Furthermore, when everybody jumped out of the bed in panic and rushed downstairs, that moment they were neatly wrapped in their shawls! That was a ridiculous goof.
Let me ask you this. Is Bengali society (and Indian) still in that level that the housewife and her educated enlightened sister work at home almost as slaves, while all male characters sit around giving orders and drinking tea and gobbling snacks and smoking constantly?! Observe how differently they treat two guests, Sunita (female) and Brojen Lahiri (male). Even after the catastrophe, the women continue to pick up debris and supply food and drink until one of them falls on her face!!
Is it still in that level that in case of a childless couple, only the wife gets tested for fertility (and to be blamed)?!
Is it still in that level that even the young characters have no prior experience of outdoor activities like rock climbing/hiking etc or rescue training in a crisis situation, other than chain smoking and reading text books?! Western young men and women probably do that every summer just for fun!
Is it still in that level that people sleep in bed in sharis and sweaters or with outdoor clothes on?! Don't adults find their own separate homes in stead of living with their parents and siblings for ever?! Are we in the wrong century? They didn't look like from 18th century though.
But my main disappointment came from somewhere else. Sandip Ray might have his own reasons for this casting, which he also mentioned in his interviews, but some of the castings felt so wrong and odd. Soumitra Chatterjee didn't have so much task here as can be demanded given his reputation. I always wondered what actually made him such a big star. People say he is a talented actor, especially in stage (live theaters). I have seen almost all his life's works, and there is absolutely no exception in his acting, in my eyes. He plays all the good old men just as the same, with the same verbal tone, with the same accent, with the same gestures. When he plays bad guys, he just sharpens his eyes in addition.
Sabyasachi, Dipankar and Rituparna gave OK performances, though I liked them better in Atmiya Swajan. On the other hand, Parambrata Chatterjee was a complete disaster. Dark shades under his eyes like a drug addict and facial hair that made him look like a lamb, was that intended? He was pathetically uncomfortable! Every time Parambrata is in the scene, the movie comes down to the level of Anjan Chowdhury/Swapan Saha/Sukhen Das's movies. That's a shame! I must say that in the west we may get a wrong impression that these two guys Soumitra and Parambrata are two gay guys, because of their feminine body language, voice, line delivery, hand gestures etc.
Raima Sen's looks and acting totally impressed me, (if we kindly ignore her imperfect Bengali accent). She gave a much better performance than her contemporary Konkona Sen Sharma in "Titli" (2002). She definitely has the lead female star potential and a very sensitive face, like her legendary grandmother. It was hard to believe that Sunita had to consider this stay-home, no-good, gay-looking young man Shyamal as a future life-partner. Just because "he was there available"!! They had absolutely no chemistry together!
I believe it was only Anita who was under stress for long time and had been suppressing her emotions inside her like volcano until the natural disaster triggered the outburst. None of the other characters had any reason for that. Their smoothly running perfect life ended up in 3-4 days' starvation+dehydration+cold, which was responsible for their hallucination and insanity, and that might lead to cannibalism in the long run.
I understand that, it is certainly different to depict the gradual psychological/behavioral transformation of the characters after the chock in hundred pages in the book, than to show it in a more realistic way in a movie in only 140 minutes. Considering that, I would give it 6 stars out of 10.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
