"Law & Order: Special Victims Unit" Taken (TV Episode 2000) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Hotel scandal
TheLittleSongbird18 March 2020
Was very impressed overall by the standard of the previous episodes, the best being as good as the best of Season 1 (which is a big compliment, being somebody who thinks highly overall of that season). The exception though was the previous episode "Asunder", which was decent and had its moments but for me it was somewhat bland and run of the mill and doesn't do enough with a type of case that doesn't interest me as much as others.

"Taken" however was a big improvement. Not quite as good as "Closure Part 2", "Legacy" and "Baby Killer", all three among the best of Season 2 and outstanding episodes though admittedly harder watches, but it is still great with pretty much everything done brilliantly. It has the tension that was missing in "Asunder", has one of the more interesting victims and has a story full of surprises. It also has a fair share of emotion and fans of Munch will be in heaven.

Is it quite one of the all-time great 'Special Victims Unit' episodes? Not quite. There is actually not really anything wrong with it as such. If to be nit-picky, the beginning is not quite as taut as the rest of the episode.

Other than that, "Taken" is classic 'Special Victims Unit' and what the show is all about. The story always absorbs and is full of twists and turns, all surprising. The ending left me floored on first viewing, still does and fills me with sadness and anger. One doesn't expect it at all. It is one of the classic examples of 'Special Victims Unit' to make one feel sorry for the accuser and by the end really hating that the victim is not what she seems and is quite amoral. The closest that the previous episodes came to having that effect was Season 1's "Disrobed", that also shocked me except we found out quite a bit later here.

Furthermore, there is emotional impact in "Taken". Really did feel sorry for Olivia, what a horrible situation she had to endure, yet still persevered which makes one admire her but feel concerned at the same time. The very end is tragic and makes one feel angry too. It is great to see more of Munch and when he has more screen time he often makes the episode even better, that's the case here as he stops the episode from being too over-serious without dominating too much. The chemistry is spot on.

Production values are slick and more refined than in the previous season and the music avoids being over-dramatic. The script is taut and is neither too simple or muddled and the story absorbs throughout. All the acting is very good, with Mariska Hargitay, Richard Belzer and Jenna Lamia standing out.

Concluding, great episode. 9/10
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Is NYPD and DA's office Liable
labenji-1216318 November 2020
Warning: Spoilers
For me, Statutory Rape is a gray area, because its when someone 18 or older has sexual relationship with a minor past the age of puberty. So for me, I have to look at it on a case by case basis, because while the law says a 16 is not old enough to consent to sex with a 22 yr old, the same body of law states it is okay for a 16 to marry a 22 yr. old with their parent's written consent, heck some states allow parents to consent to their 12 yr. old marrying a 30 yr. old, but if her parents says its okay, then its not statutory rape?!

That's why I was so angry with end results of the pawn's treatment as a predator of young girls, when we are talking about 1 female, I just hope in the real world that NYPD & DA's office would be successful sued for wrongful incarceration, but I know due to this psychotic families well laid trap of using his DNA against him the law acted accordingly. Just left me so damn pissed!
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
White trash con artists
bkoganbing17 January 2016
Warning: Spoilers
One of the most amoral characters ever to appear on an SVU episode is Siobhan Miller. She's part of a gang of white trash con artists who stage shakedowns of various establishments with fake rape accusations.

In this story it's the opening of a new five star hotel in Manhattan where we see her stagger disheveled out of an elevator on opening night crying rape.

The rapist turns out to be Derek Cecil who is on the sex offenders registry. But he turns out to be the least culpable of any and that also includes hotel staff involved.

Miller is some piece of work, a person totally without an ounce of decency in her makeup. It all ends in tragedy, but she gets nailed good and proper as a result of work done by ADA Stephanie March and Detective Richard Belzer.

Belzer particularly among the cast stands out as the first to spot something wrong in SVU's original case.
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
WHY SO LITTLE EMPATHY?
Alex_GJTweet23 April 2023
Warning: Spoilers
An innocent man spends time in prison where is being raped and get killed.......and noone is interested in the end?

That's not why we watch SVU in the first place.

I hate the fact that only Munch cares about it.

Apart from this, it's a good episode. One of the them that reminds you the golden times of svu. Strong plot and pace. It's like watching a very good movie. All in 45 minutes.

I love Alex Cabot in court. I wish I had seen Benson and Stabler being moved by the tragic incident in the end. That reminds me of the episode "Baby Killer". Same emotions at the end.

I guess the screenwriter wants to show variety of opinions. But for me, the main characters must be more sensitive.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I din't buy it -way too contrived
lor_23 July 2023
What seems like a straightforward rape case for the Special Victims Unit team gets complicated, thanks to having taken place at a gala luxury hotel opening. Plenty of clues to a coverup and behind the scenes skullduggery keep things moving while Belzer and Ice-T perform plenty of sleuthing.

The authorities move along, anxious to pin the crime on whoever's most obvious among a growing list of suspects, making the ultimate unraveling of what happened seem quite contrived (an example of extreme audience manipulation by the screenwriters). Perhaps the most intresting issues introduced here are not followed up, because the cops/ditrict attorney as "good guys" is too much of a given premise for these shows. In fact, only Richard Belzer (RIP) is permitted to show an ounce of sympathy for the collateral damage of the innocent guy they arrest with tragic results.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed