This episode is about a very controversial topic: the judicial system. There are two different cases. A family court judge, who years ago took two children away from their father, because he "neglected" them, where it's not at all sure that you can call that neglect, when a father has to work three jobs to support his family (of children). There are certainly cases were children are neglected, were parents don't care about their children, but I completely disagree with Bonasera and Taylor that this is such a case. If society (by the people that are responsible to make a judgment about this) calls this neglect, then society should see to it that the single parent can support his family without having to work three jobs. Society can't have it both ways.
The other case where the mother of Ruben, who was killed in a previous episode, finds out that the perpetrator (who is not really responsible for the dead of Ruben, since he was killed by a bullet fired by a shopkeeper that shot at the robber) is out on bail and steals Danny's gun to go and kill him, I'd have to agree with the robber, I'd say she's a nutcase. For me there's no excuse to justify this. The death of Ruben was an accident, but committed by the shopkeeper and not even the robber.
The other case where the mother of Ruben, who was killed in a previous episode, finds out that the perpetrator (who is not really responsible for the dead of Ruben, since he was killed by a bullet fired by a shopkeeper that shot at the robber) is out on bail and steals Danny's gun to go and kill him, I'd have to agree with the robber, I'd say she's a nutcase. For me there's no excuse to justify this. The death of Ruben was an accident, but committed by the shopkeeper and not even the robber.