Monsters Among Men (2017) User Reviews

Bad vampire flick

[Gunnar_R_Ingibjargarson · 4/10 · 12 February 2019]

A young man and his girlfriend, walking in the park are attacked by a group of vampires, and have to find a way to escape. A very amateury horror film. Bad acting, awful script.

Definitely Watchable

[spoken · 13 October 2017]

On Amazon Prime. I liked this enough to watch through to the end-of-credits scene. Sorry, no spoiler for this. 8) This B-movie gave vamps a different source/backstory, different from anything I've seen before, that is. The monsters are not entirely strong, and they are searching for a food source that will make them less frail.

If you decide to check out "Monsters Among Men" (2017) then you should expect to find pockets of questionable acting, lines and sets, but all together they aren't too bad. At times the film looks more like a televised play (think PBS) than a movie, but I didn't have any real problem with that; it seemed to happen only during the dark-of-night scenes.

If IMDb ever gives us a chance to vote on this flick I'll probably give it a 6/10 stars.

Underwhelming

[Leofwine_draca · 2/10 · 17 May 2021]

MONSTERS AMONG MEN is a dullish kidnap thriller made on an indie budget. The cabin in the woods setting recalls THE EVIL DEAD but there the similarities between the two movies end. Although the blurb mentions vampires don't expect to see anything interesting or out of the ordinary here. This is just a talky, dialogue-based drama with lots of repetitive staging and a generally underwhelming style. The best thing about it? The acting isn't quite as bad as you'd expect.