"Nova" Poisoned Water (TV Episode 2017) Poster

(TV Series)

(2017)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Don't s--t where you drink...
poe-4883314 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
POISONED WATER, which looks at lead contamination in the drinking water in both Washington, D.C. and Flint, Michigan, should serve as a wakeup call for the rest of the country. Just a few days ago, as I write this, the toxic chemical GenX (used in the manufacturing of Teflon and various fire-resistant products in a factory north of here), has been discovered in the drinking water right here in Wilmington, North Carolina. An "open and transparent" meeting with local leaders is scheduled for tomorrow morning... BEHIND CLOSED DOORS. A single reporter (without camera or audio recording equipment) will be allowed to attend this "open and transparent" meeting. North Carolinians are always slow to get the gist of things (especially when the local "news" outlets do little more than refer viewers to websites where they can peruse 100% REDACTED documents regarding water contamination), but this one's a no-brainer even WE should be able to see through. How serious might the contamination here be? Erin Brockovich has already weighed in on the issue. THAT, if nothing else, should raise some red flags. Paging MIKE PAPANTONIO...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Overly dramatic and focuses on the drama rather than the info
JurijFedorov30 September 2020
It's a fine enough doc. Nothing special. The Flint crisis to me is very interesting because you see how enormously the public sector can screw up simple jobs and then also because it's interesting to hear about water pollution and how to measure it.

Unfortunately this documentary is not about the evidence but rather about the emotional outbursts from Flint citizens and outsiders. Often a pollution level would be explained in the doc by "And I couldn't work for a period of time because I got sick." That's not really proving anything. People constantly get sick or just don't turn up for work because they overslept. This sort of anecdotal evidence is often just misperceptions. After Chernobyl by far the biggest problem is people thinking the pollution is worse than it is. You can actually live in the Chernobyl area without any repercussions if you just avoid drinking goat milk and eating certain fruits from the trees. People don't know that they think just being there is dangerous which has caused mass panic that's destructive to whole families.

What we have of evidence here is shaky at best. Some regular wife without any expertise tested only her water and nothing else. Some single random researcher decided to test this stuff without any big team behind him. Some college students paid with pizza did some tests that frankly felt amatourish and subjective as they talked about them. Some ideological researcher made it her life mission to find any type of pollution level in any type of patient. I know the government really screwed the pooch here, but unfortunately the documentary rather makes it seem like ideological and irrational people made a big case out of very little. Where are the professional measures and opinions? Where are the comparisons to other Michigan towns? The truth is that it's very hard to find any water pollution in Flint on the level that would cause any long-lasting effects let alone effects you can see day to day as the people talk mention. That doesn't mean it's not there. It's just that we need to know exactly how bad it is and this doc doesn't tell us that. Who got fined or imprisoned? The doc doesn't tell us that. We just know something is happening and some people are angry.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed