Reviews

56 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Tumbbad (2018)
8/10
A TALE OF BATTLES BROUGHT BY GREED
24 February 2024
This indie flick is something most cinephiles have absolutely loved. It has the speciality of being a Hindi film and also something really good, as this combination is a rare one these days.

The film perfectly utilizes the fascination-inducing capabilities of fantasy and mythology. A tale of how human greed ultimately leads to self-destruction, the story which is set in mid-20th century Maharashtra, coupled with good costumes and a well-worked production design, brings the perfect mood the film tries to give the audience. The scenes, frames, and sequences are directed without many flaws, which has given the film the right pacing to keep the viewers hooked.

Horror has the capacity to go much broader, rather than being stuck with ghosts and serial killers. And Tumbbad is a film that pushes horror in the direction of mythology and human emotions.

A must-watch for anyone looking for horror with a new face.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bramayugam (2024)
9/10
THE HORRORS OF POWER
24 February 2024
Power is something that kills the human that it possesses and creates only an image of the human, with the demon of power living beneath its flesh and skin.

Set in 17th-century Southern Malabar, in a caste-based surrounding that has a rigid power structure in practice, the ambience of which, is perfected through technical brilliance brought by black and white imagery, and creates an atmosphere of heart-trembling horror that grips and shocks the viewer from beginning to end.

The larger part of the story happens in a closed atmosphere, with a production design that is beyond perfect. The setting itself is inserted into a mythical sphere, incorporating elements from folklore and Hindu mythology, which acts as instruments to showcase the established power structure in the first half of the film, and the struggle to overturn and establish power in new hands, in the second half.

The horror is brought largely through the remarkable sound design, which spreads a fire in the chest of viewers with its intensity.

From beginning to end, not even a single second is left unwanted.

And Mammootty, the legendary actor delivers a completely new and exceptional performance as Koduman Potty. As a towering and monstrous figure, he shines on the screen.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Whale (2022)
8/10
TERRIBLY HEARTWARMING
17 November 2023
Darren Aronofsky's last film, released just a year ago, starring Brendan Fraser sent shockwaves through the world of cinema. The talks around the film were mainly two: Brendan Fraser's epic comeback, showcasing a terribly awesome performance and the controversy stirred up by woke commentators and critics; as the movie went against the new laws of woke rhetoric.

The movie is a heart-melting high-intense drama, which is impossible to sit through without one's emotions getting boiled and cooked up into a dish of distress and sadness. The grippy writing and penetrating direction combined with Fraser's performance make the film complete and powerful.

The story is layered and deep. With a protagonist living in regret, depression and disgust. Ruminating his mistakes and errors, he tries to do what he can to rectify them but dives more into the same regret and depression as he isn't finding acknowledgement for doing so. He loses hope but tries to fire it up using positive affirmations and optimism. But at the end of the day, he lives a life so disgusting and pathetic. In the waste of his self-destructive obesity and over-eating disorder. The physical condition of the protagonist, unhealthy and unattractive, which invited much criticism and controversy with even allegations of fatphobia and fat shaming, is actually a fitting image reflective of his suffering and brokenness.

The film questions certain ideals. For example, the ideals of honesty and staying true to ourselves. His life went downhill when the protagonist embraced his true sexuality. His whole life turned itself upside down, to the point of finding no repair. This poses a question of whether we should choose, to stay true to who we are or the overall stability of our life and those around us.

The film's depth goes much more, towards questioning religion, and established narratives for securing emotional well-being, with an afterlife far better than the current life. But the film asks, if one is too hard in his sufferings, can he even stare for at least a single moment at the sight of that so-called afterlife, even if it's full of beauty and glory?

The film is deeply disturbing, thought-provoking and heart-wrenching. The aspect ratio, and focus on the protagonist, as the film's centre, with the whole world closed inside his house, provide the perfect mood and ambience the film needs.

A film that portrays what we are all afraid of, which could haunt us every one, just like it did to the protagonist.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A MULTI-LAYERED MASTERPIECE
23 June 2023
A film with no visible errors, in any aspect of it, is a very rare thing. At the same time, having multiple layers of subtext, and executing it all on the screen with the perfect blend of keeping the narrative clean without any overlapping from subtext that unnecessarily complicates the narrative and also showing the subtext through symbols, metaphors, historical events and other tropes, keeping it hidden beneath the narrative is a very commendable job. Points for Martin McDonagh here. More points can be given to him, he makes the movie too mysterious that it requires a thorough investigation to extract all the ideas out. It engages the viewer's intellect, and makes him excavate through the layers the film has embedded in it. Thus, the viewer can truly participate in the film.

The Banshees of Inisherin come with a variety of layers in it. Philosophical, psychological and historical.

From a historical point of view, the story rhymes with the Irish civil war. When Irishmen who fought for their freedom from the Britishers ended up taking two sides and fighting each other. The bloodshed and conflicts that occurred between the Irish Free State Army led by Michael Collins and Irish Republican Army led by Eamon de Valera. Two people who worked and fought together like brothers split apart and fought amongst themselves.

In the film, the whole story revolves around a conflict between two friends. Padraic Suilleabhan (Collin Farrell) and Colm Doherty (Brendan Gleeson). Padraic becomes shattered and sinks into sadness when his best friend Colm Doherty says he doesn't like him anymore and doesn't want to talk to him anymore. Colm is a violinist, he wants to write tunes and enhance his craft. Make a name for himself as a musician. So, he can't waste time simply chatting aimlessly with Padraic. He wants to do something meaningful with his time. That is, pursuing his art.

Whereas, Padraic is shown as one of life's good guys, "a happy lad", as he proclaims himself. He is kind, nice, slightly naive, and simply good to other people. A pleasant fellow.

The conflict between Padraic and Colm can be seen as a conflict between two differing philosophies.

Colm represents heroism and personal achievement on one side. And Padraic represents kindness and humanity on the contrary.

Colm's ideals of personal achievement, which equates to heroism, can be considered as an equivalent of conquest and domination. Here he conquers through his art. He can make his name written in the books of history. When analyzed from a peculiar perspective, that's a non-violent way of conquest. In conquest, the conqueror gets territory, power and wealth. Here territory and power are substituted with fame, acceptance and praise. Colm could be seen as a metaphor for Eamon de Valera or as an allegory of the Irish Republican Army starting the Irish Civil War.

Whereas, Padraic, the good guy, shows kindness and humanity as I said before. Who likes simply to chat, have fun with his friend, and be a happy lad. But the problem here is the fundamental contradiction between conquest and kindness. Violence and humanity.

Martin McDonagh wrote the psychological layer with pretty good depth. We can see what has happened to both Padraic and Colm emotionally, over the course of time. Colm's hatred turns Padraic into something which he wasn't at the beginning of the film. Not a good and kind guy, but someone of vengeance. Whereas, in Colm, he peaks his violence and causes violence to himself. Which could mean that the toxicity of the grudge and hatred he had against Padraic, and the obsession he had with his aims, make him self-destructive. He is shown as depressed. Which becomes worse over time. In the confession, the priest asks 'How's the despair?'. This probably hints at his depressive mental state and a previous disclosure of it to the priest.

Here we can find the blending of psychological and philosophical layers. It might be showcasing the moral conflicts of the writer.

The dynamism of the two characters' behaviour might be indicative of that. The writer might be telling that conflicts are devastating, for both parties, irrespective of which side they are on.

The depth of the film opens up exciting chances for curious watchers. There are a lot of miscellaneous characters like Dominic Kearney, Mrs McCormick and Siobhan.

The creepiest of all characters is Mrs McCormick played by Sheila Flitton. From her appearance itself, we can understand that she is the Banshee in the film. She stays relaxed, amused and observes. Doesn't scream or portend death. She says it in the calmest manner possible.

She is not portrayed with mystery or horror. But when reflected upon her significance in the film, mysteries do arise. The narrative does not require her presence. The narrative will keep going on even if she is absent from the script. But still, McDonagh gives a subtle relevance to her. Maybe she is the one he sees as designated to understand his fictional island of Inisherin. The whole Island is depressed. Just like Padraic without the company of Colm. And Colm, as I said before, is depressed, but not everyone on the island chops off their fingers like him. Others cover up their sorrows. Officer Kearney says about a 29-year-old fellow who walked into a lake. This could be a hint at the gloom of the whole Island.

Another interesting character is Dominic (Barry Keoghan). A poor fellow he seems to be, dim and dull. The whole Island mocks at him. What makes him relevant in the film, is a serious question. The writer has given much attention to him. He is not a passive character, instead, has significant depth. He constantly tries to be close to the Suilleabhans. Accompanies Padraic oftentimes, comforts him, asks him to forget about Colm and their broken friendship, and steals his father's poteen to drink with him. Goes for dinner at their home. And a very stunning act of proposing to Siobhan. He wants the friendship of Padraic and the love of Siobhan. "I thought you were the nicest of them" he says to Padraic. Like everyone else on the Island, he too is depressed. He wants a bit of company. He chooses the Suilleabhans because they were the best among everyone else.

Now let's come to Siobhan (Kerry Condon). She is talented, well-read, and yearns for a better life. She wants to escape the gloominess of Inisherin. Despite leaving her beloved brother behind, she feels excited about the new place she reached, as evident from the letter she wrote to Padraic. Some analysts have found her to be a metaphor for all those who fled from Ireland during the civil war, escaping from its madness. Siobhan too leaves Inisherin from its madness. It's gloom, grudges and boring life. She is lonely. When Dominic proposed to her, she wasn't disturbed, from seeing her emotions, we can understand she had sympathy for him. Also at the same time, a feeling of relief and joy emerged from knowing that someone was loving her.

To understand how deep these characters are, we must investigate even further. It's anyway a worthwhile quest, to unlock the mysteries of Inisherin. So, I leave that to the readers. You may require countless amounts of re-watches, but it ain't a big deal. The film's craft makes that job easier.

Music and cinematography are exceptional, truly matching the level of quality a film of this magnitude requires. All the actors played their roles in a manner that was beyond perfect. The most exceptional among all was Kerry Condon. She is the star of the film.

All this combined with McDonagh's direction, makes this nothing less than a masterpiece. Perfect, intriguing, thought-provoking, and above all subtly mysterious.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mirror (1975)
10/10
CINEMA THAT ISN'T CINEMA
9 May 2023
Tarkovsky the Russian legend long time ago made a film. How could one call it a film? It is no film. What is it then? Even Tarkovsky doesn't know. It's a moving picture. In fact, Moving pictures.

Every film has a story, but not this one. It doesn't needs one. Just what is shown is more than enough.

According to Tarkovsky, it's about his memories, the people he had around him, and his childhood. Maybe that's why it can't be sculpted in a story. Stories are stories, they are not something beyond that. But memories are beyond stories. They appear in strange and indescribable ways. Sometimes in dreams, in our imaginations, at times they unknowingly fly out from us, into our poems, paintings and stories.

The Mirror shows the dreams, memories, moments, past, present and future that are in a man's brain. The terribly indescribable nature of all that becomes the film's language.

The surreal picturisation of a Mirror, which shows the reflection of all that's greatly valued by the artist. In this art, the artist breaks down the conventional notions of cinematic art and crafts an art that advances the whole art of cinema. This isn't cinema, it's beyond cinema.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Iblis (I) (2018)
9/10
AN UNAPPRECIATED PIECE OF GEM
9 May 2023
A refreshing experience the film puts forward to the viewer. A wonderful experiment arose in the mind of Rohith, the director. These types of films are what could push the level of art that will be churned out every year in the cinema industry. It doesn't matter if the film is a flop or a success, if the film has in it something fresh and delightful to offer to the viewer, then that's more than enough. But at most times, the audience who are accustomed only to a certain type of cliche that gets them the entertainment they want, they won't find out-of-the-box experiments interesting.

But there are other types of film watchers. Those who keep an interest in cinema that transcends mere entertainment, or the kind of entertainment commercial cinema usually offers, it's them who will find this film a piece of gem.

The film is based on the story of Vyshakhan and Fidaa, who lives on a fictional island that's right opposite to an actual society in many aspects. A very strange place. The most significant of all the strangeness is the lack of sorrow people usually have when someone dies. And a subtly shown aspect, which at many times becomes thoroughly direct and explicit, is the absence of conventional norms practised by society and religion. Throughout the film, life and death are projected, as a discourse that's expressed in subtle language. The philosophy the makers try to convey is simple and is explicitly revealed in the end.

The viewer can smoothly traverse through every scene and frame. Vyshakhan's love for Fidaa and his adventures for attaining her love is brilliantly picturized through fantastical imagery that brings much delight to the viewer's eyes. A very important aspect of the film is its emphasis on sweets. Fidaa is from a home that's engaged in the sweets business. The expression of Vyshakhan's love is partly done through "sweets". The flavour and taste of sweets are absorbed by the camera and music. A poetic blend that implicitly displays the symbolic connection between sweets, love, and from a broader perspective, life. The film's language is heavily composed of childishness, which shapes the fantasy. It is shown in a wide scale of elements, such as icons, imagery, music, the basic plot etc. And that itself is the aesthetic of the film which is unknown to Malayalam cinema.

The writing acts as the foundation for the visual fantasy that's displayed in the film. Sameer Abdul's development of the plot and some of the dialogues that aid the storytelling captures the freshness and eccentricity of Rohith's story.

The viewer can travel into another world once the film starts. Enjoy every frame with much delight, and feel the sweetness of Fidaa and Vyshakhan's love, it's adventure and philosophy.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A COMPLEX TALE OF BEAUTY
9 May 2023
An eccentric maker made an eccentric film. Inspiration from a weird ad couldn't go anything beyond Nanpakal Nerathu Mayakkam. Lijo with his quirky strings of imagination, has given us a great ride in his latest slow-paced epic drama.

Experiments drive art beyond its frontiers. That's what the maker is accustomed to and it is not broken in his latest experiment.

It makes one wonder how can an artist take inspiration from an advertisement that should've gone irrelevant and unnoticed. An inspiration heavy enough to make the artist blend the narrative shown in the ad with his complex philosophy. Which eventually becomes a perfectly composed amalgamation.

The whole movie picturised through still frames starts with a pilgrimage trip to Velankannimaatha Church in Tamil Nadu. The pilgrims are all theatre actors from Kerala. While returning the key actor of the troupe James transforms himself into Sundaram upon reaching a Tamil village. The journey becomes bumpy from here on. Everyone, both the Malayalis and Tamilians are shocked seeing this.

What could this transformation mean? James, one who hates even Tamil food acts like a Tamilian's spirit has entered into him.

From a particular point of view, one can interpret it as an actor's desperate attempt to establish a connection between two ethnically different people. In that attempt, the actor moves into a different language, culture and religion. The actor's greatest role ever played.

Apart from interpretation, what would it mean for Lijo? Is he trying to establish exactly what the above interpretation points out? Or is it a film that arose out of his nostalgia? Or a film that tries to bind together people through the essential humanism that possibly lies in every human? The maker might be trying to portray all of these!

Anyhow, it ultimately lies with every individual who watches the film. Great art evokes thoughts in the beholder. That's what exactly Nanpakal Nerathu Mayakkam does. A thousand viewers, a thousand interpretations, and maybe a hundred inspirations.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
RRR (2022)
5/10
VISUAL TREAT FOR A ONE-TIME-WATCH
10 October 2022
The movie ran well in the box office, collected a whopping 1,115 crore rupees, became Top 5 in Netflix US. A global sensation that is much hyped and successful in getting high ratings in many online movie review and rating platforms.

When I watched the film in theatre, I felt goosebumps covering all over my skin. The experience felt indescribably great. But still it seems the movie isn't a great one.

Visual Effects and Direction are all top-notch, one of the best in Indian Commercial Cinema. But something that is really necessary for a film to be good is a well-written screenplay, and that's what the film lacks horribly. The story is very weak and shallow that the director made all the aesthetic dependent on the breathtaking visual effects, larger-than-life protagonists and over-the-top action scenes.

The action scenes are all well-shot and pulsating, and the defiance of physics doesn't have to be taken into consideration.

Also at the same time, the most significant problem of the film lies here too. At the end of the film, it seemed like the whole movie was made only to be a gallery for action scenes. The exaggerated action scenes, even though they are good to watch, doesn't have a good story to be attached with. The story is too weak that it cant even be considered a story.

Two guys form a friendship, later on splits apart and forms the friendship once again, and fights for their aim together. If I go for a better detailing it will end up in spoilers. The two lead characters are also resembled with historical and mythological characters, but even that wasn't given any proper writing. The lack of depths in characters and weak conflicts are the main problems that could be seen in the screenplay.

It's a movie on a budget of 550 crores, but the story is not something that satisfy spending on that scale. And it's an SS Rajamouli film, the magnificence of his previous films like Baahubali is explicitly missing in RRR mainly due to the apparent lack of quality in the screenplay.

Whatever it is, the film is still a watchable one. The visual effects and action scenes does the job of making the viewer stay focused on the screen till the end. But still, those VFX stunts are all just instant gratification, not something of good artistic value.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A CELEBRATION OF DESTRUCTION AND CHAOS
10 October 2022
Set in Kanhangad, a modest town in North Kerala, arrangements are underway for Vijayan's second daughter, Suja's engagement. On what should be a perfect ceremony, the bride is having second thoughts, her father is in a financial mess, and as members of their family arrive one by one, family secrets start to surface. Set within the two days preceding the ceremony, the entire film happens in and around Vijayan's house.

A marriage or engagement is something which we all celebrate! There will be dance and music! But here in this film, the engagement is celebrated with the cancellation of the engagement on the night before the engagement! How? Familial clash, patriarch of the family going crazy out of anger, combating through words and action with relatives, totalitarianism of the patriarch, not having democracy etc etc... Root cause of all these problems is what the film is trying to destroy! What are the root causes? Societal norms, lack of freedom due to regressive thoughts, gossiping, intrusion into someone else's life, stupidity etc etc... All of these destroyed at the end after great chaos!

A Senna Hegde magic! This film doesn't even know how extended or occasional lags will even happen in cinema! Contains such well-written screenplay which has realistic dialogues which will showcase pure realism and events, sequences and acts which succeeds in exciting the viewer and maintaining the rhythm of the film.

Direction is all well-done, the camera movements which the director used are something which are not that seen in mainstream offbeat films, the dynamism of the camera movements gives nothing but a success in capturing the realism with great perfection!

A must watch for all!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Churuli (2021)
10/10
A TRIP LIKE NO OTHER
10 October 2022
After months and months anticipation The Master of Chaos Lijo Jose Pellissery's Churuli is now available to watch. The film is one kind of a gem which is a great contribution to the entire world cinema! A slow-paced thriller which grips the viewer with its haunting background score and visuals which are photographed in a miraculous manner which gives a horror-fantasy mood to the film and elevates the on-screen anticipation of the viewer. The film successfully travels through various aesthetics caused by the smooth and steady shift from realism to magical realism and from there to surrealism. The director and the team accomplished in creating a well-toned and structured choreography which has no visible flaws. And what stands out the most is the highly appreciable sound work. Which gives the viewer a vibe like he is in a wild forest which is soaked in horror and mystery.

The story of the film starts as a simple one but becomes more and more complex as the movie progresses. Anthony and Shajeevan two police officers sets out to catch a criminal who is hiding in a forest. As they reach the forest Shajeevan realize that something is deeply wrong with that place, from the people to the entire forest is at the greater depths of some weirdness. The climax is surreal, and have never seen before in any indian film. A magic which is one of a kind!

Lijo Jose Pellissery is a truly a genius filmmaker, who I hope will bring revolutionary changes in Malayalam cinema. And he is proving that since 2013 with his film Amen.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
APPRECIABLE EXPERIMENT
6 March 2022
The film revolves around a once-grand, now-drab hotel in Munnar, where a couple, Pavithran and Haripriya, checks-in for a jolly stay. All the hotel employees and residents seem odd from the beginning itself. Then, a theft happens there and everyone's a suspect

An enjoyable fun-ride from Ratheesh Balachandra Poduval after his family drama Android Kunjappan Ver 5.25 which was released back in 2018.

The genre and theme is absolutely fresh in Malayalam cinema. Absurd Comedy from the beginning to the end. The film was watchable and enjoyable throughout but many of the absurdities which Ratheesh tried to make funny didn't workout very well instead it just bounced back as a failure. But still many of the jokes actually worked and it was really funny. What the film succeeded is in keeping a fun-chill-mood until the end. Which is a great plus-point in the film.

The performance from all the actors were incredibly enjoyable and applaudable. Especially the performance of Grace Anthony, Vinay Forrt and Jaffer Idukki.

The technical aspects were greatly impressive, inspired from The Grand Budapest Hotel and other Wes Anderson films. The frames, composition, lighting and the color grading, all made the movie look more aesthetically pleasing to the viewer and accomplished in establishing a good mood and tone for the entire film.

Overall, the film is worthy of watching and an appreciable experiment from Ratheesh Balachandra Poduval. His genre of choice is worth encouraging, it's good that he who made a film like Android Kunjappan made this flick, which means it's a pretty enormous attempt.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Eternals (2021)
5/10
SOMEWHAT AN ENTERTAINING FILM WITH DECENT AMOUNT OF THRILL AND EXHILARATION, BUT LACKS SUBSTANCE.
6 March 2022
Eternals is one of the biggest releases of Marvel this year and it's been in theatres for a while.

The movie is somewhat a watchable flick which do have certain amount of content which gives the viewer goosebumps and thrill. With pretty good VFX being an advantage to the movie the film succeeds technically too. Where the film goes down is in the unnecessary comedy scenes and dialogues which may give the viewer a slight feeling of sleep coming to him and saying "hey, buddy what bout taking a nap for a while?". And its a problem which Marvel has for the past couple of years, adding comedy can be pretty good sometimes but Marvel movies usually never succeeds in doing that, because the jokes which they add are actually a waste of time. And also it destroys the superhero-vibe of the film. In this film it was the first half which had a lot of unnecessary jokes which ended becoming a factor for creating some snores. But the second half of the film was pretty enjoyable and thrilling. It was well directed and the cinematography also looked beautiful. Another drawback was in the writing, some characters were poorly written which made them just a piece of cringe.

Overall, a watchable flick.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Shining (1980)
10/10
A MASTERPIECE LIKE NO OTHER
6 March 2022
Whenever we hear the name Stanley Kubrick, the poster, scene or a shot from The Shining will come to our mind - most probably " Here's Johnny!". For a legendary filmmaker like Kubrick who has multiple masterpieces to his credit, would still be fine if he had never even made this film. But still, there would be some great missing which will be felt! That's because of The Shining's ability to penetrate into the viewer's mind, even the subconscious, and imprint an influence in it's deeper depths. How the movie hooks the viewer with its horror which is created from several dimensions are a remarkable factor which makes this film an all-perfect masterpiece which is thrilling and exciting even after watching umpteen number of times.

How Kubrick created the horror, just one among the many factors which makes the film a great one (still a very important one though), is so deep and mind-blowing, he builds tension in the viewer with enough substance written in the screenplay to showcase on the screen, and perfectly well-tuned and tastefully directed horror. And most importantly, the background music and sounds which has immense depth with it's structuring crafted to the innermost core and the finely touched upper layers. And the actors who gives performances which are dramatically aesthetic and showcases face expressions which are realistic to the utmost extent. As the film progresses the anticipation for something scary to expect in the upcoming scenes are created successfully and the anticipation which it created was also executed by scaring the viewer with horrors of huge intensity.

One thing which is found in this film, is in fact something of a variety. It's the portrayal of the supernatural in a very realistic manner, which is done in an absolutely subtle way which doesn't let the viewer know that it's a realistic portrayal of the supernatural, in fact he won't even care to notice it. Because that's how successfully it's done. And what's the use of it? It gives an impact on the viewer which affects the way in which he percieves the film, and that too which will be something of an advantage for the filmmaker.

I don't intend to say anything about the story of the film, whether it's supernatural horror or the breakdown of a madman's mind, is still debated among cinephiles, even after 40 years of the film's release. And that's also a thing which makes the film a great one! Rather than just showing what the maker wants to show, Kubrick let's the viewer decide what the film is, by making him analyse the film in his own perspective and coming up with an interpretation. And this is a form of interactive cinema, an indirect one though.

The Shining is one the greatest horror masterpieces, or even one of the best films of all time.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A FILM ABOUT ALIENS
17 August 2021
This animated tale follows the relationship between the small human-like Oms and their much larger blue-skinned oppressors, the Draags, who rule the planet of Ygam. While the Draags have long kept Oms as illiterate pets, this hierarchy shifts after an Om boy becomes educated, thanks to a young female Draag. This leads to an Om rebellion, which weakens the Draag control over their race. Will the Oms and the Draags find a way to coexist? Or will they destroy each other?

For a human being or a group of human beings, there's a lot of aliens around them - animals, birds, people of other classes who are inferior to them according to the social hierarchy, etc.

This is an animated feature film which shows all of that, in a way which is perfect to grasp.

Re-watching again and again will reveal more and more layers of subtext.

This film will be great to know how animation was back in early 70s. Every frame looks just like a pure hand-drawn picture - how it was back then.

A must watch. Eye opener.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
SOMEWHAT GOOD, SOMEWHAT NOT VERY GOOD
17 August 2021
The expectations which the hype of the film created on me was pretty immense, but I was somewhat disappointed, at least to some extent, it may happen to you also.

The screenplay is littered with a lot unnecessary scenes and dialogues - in the first half, after that the film gets on a track which is quite enjoyable, I am not saying that its pretty great, I am saying that it was somewhat fine to sit through. But the first half felt like a chore to sit through.

Another drawback, the failed execution of comedy. It was pretty cringey...!

And also the poor pacing contributed in lagging the first half.

But everything was just smooth and fine in the second half. And the visuals and frames were all elegant in its appearance.

And the third act was pretty exhilarating!

The Look and Effect which the Wide aspect ratio gave was pretty awesome.

Overall, it's a one-time watch!
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Vasthuhara (1991)
10/10
THE MAGIC OF A TRUE ARTISTIC WORK OF CINEMA, HAS NO DEATH!
7 August 2021
The story is told through the eyes of Venu, a Malayali government officer send for a mission in Calcutta to rehabilitate refugees to the Andaman and Nicobar Islands.

Even after 25 years of its release, the film is so fresh. Succeeds in connecting the viewer to it.

Just like every Aravindan film, this film too is slow-paced, but still the level of engagement the movie delivers is impeccable. And that's how good pacing works.

A true artistic work of cinema, has no death, it would always be magical! And Vaasthuhara is the proof that it's true!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Kummatty (1979)
10/10
PURE MAGICAL CINEMA
31 July 2021
The film is a Pied Piper-like figment of Malabar's folklore about a partly mythic and partly real magician called Kummatty (bogeyman).

Aravindan's Kummatty is a movie which is at the highest form of art.

Every song, every frame, the viewer will dissolve in it.

A film which defines what arthouse is.

Kummatty has something magical, and that's what a film must have, especially an arthouse piece of cinematic work.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
ALL EYES ON THE SCREEN TILL THE END OF THE FILM
27 July 2021
A big-city detective helps two inept small-town cops investigate a serial killer.

Bong Joon-Ho's Memories of Murder is a very good film which will keep you engaged throughout the film. It has a thrilling screenplay which contains all the necessary elements to be a good thriller and also to keep the viewer thrilled.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Oldboy (2003)
8/10
A FILM OF UNPREDICTABILITY
26 July 2021
A man, held captive for no apparent reason for years, is given a cell phone, money and expensive clothes and released. Unless he finds out the identity of his captor, an even worse fate awaits him.

Park Chan-Wook's Oldboy is a well-written and directed mystery drama thriller with a twist which is at the peak of unpredictability.

But that twist may not create an impact on every viewer in the same manner as it caused in most of the people who watched the film. But still that factor is not enough to consider this as a bad film.

Recommending...!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Aarkkariyam (2021)
8/10
THIS FILM IS SOMETHING REALLY FRESH
19 July 2021
Shirley(Parvathy Thiruvothu) and Roy(Sharafuddin), a married couple, move to her hometown in Kerala ahead of a nationwide lockdown. They face several challenges and try to overcome their personal issues.

The usual style in crime films - add some twists, there should be a villain who makes everything so tense, and finally the hero overcomes it. Or, solve a murder case, find the culprit.

But in this film - there's a cliche break, the conflict is shown in a very subtle way, there's no villain, and everything goes in a very slow pace. When you hear about the pacing being slow, you may consider not to watch the film, if you do that - you're doing a mistake. Because, here the slow-pace won't bring any lag. Not just the slow-pace, nothing tense is shown on the screen, but still you would feel engaged - How?, This film proves that tension, unsolvable-like conflict, fast pacing - all these are not necessary to make a viewer feel engaged. The question "How?" Is still here in the context, it is done by showcasing the mental state and the internal conflict of the character. In such scenes, Usually a loud and high-toned background music will be used, but here the director chose low-toned music which are not loud at all, by doing this the overall slow-pace, natural and realistic mood of the film was protected.

This film will be well-worth of your time, a different but good experience, a crime-drama which will not increase your heartbeat but something which may keep you engaged.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
EXPERIMENTAL TRASH
19 July 2021
Techno-Horror, the genre is unfamiliar in malayalam cinema. So, congratulations to the writers, directors and producer for thinking out of the box, but that's not everything, the movie is trash, it is extremely void of value.

The plot is about a woman who faces horrifying events after buying a smartphone.

No remarkable acting from anybody who were seen on the screen.

The cinematography looked amateurish at many times. The lighting and color grading were focused on making the frames look good instead of creating a mood.

The directors didn't do anything apart from pacing the film well.

The writing was pretty good too and it was pretty watchable and viewer will feel engaged.

All these are in the first and second acts.

Now when it comes to the third act, whatever there is - extremely horrible. The screenplay consisted of a lot of unconvincing elements. The direction was so poor, the good pacing which was there previously was lost, what's shown on the scenes are so tense but the viewer will have to watch so passively and pretentiously without feeling any emotions. Another major element in those scenes were visual effects, and it would have been much better if the VFX work was given to some animation students.

The movie is Watchable - except the final act, but still, watch it at your own risk.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sara's (2021)
5/10
IT HAS A GOOD STORY AND MESSAGE BUT FAILS TO BE A GOOD FILM DUE TO THE OUTDATED STYLE OF DIRECTION AND WRITING.
19 July 2021
An aspiring filmmaker faces stigmatic trouble after her marriage regarding her pregnancy.

Stories like this do have a potential to be a good film, but here everything is shattered due to the outdated style of writing and making. The screenplay consists of poorly written dialogues which are so cringe to hear. It would have been pretty fine 10-15 years ago but in today's overall cinematic atmosphere the viewer may find it problematic. Apart from the writing, the director failed to express whats written in an organic manner. The main reason behind that is still the poor writing.

The performance from the cast is also poor - sometimes over-the-top, cringe-worthy and dull.

The production design and art direction is pretty glamorous but it looks somewhat unrealistic - similar to that of in commercial advertisements.

Something which is really good in this film is the cinematography, the lighting is given at a perfect amount, the frames looked so gorgeous.

Overall as a movie it has a very bad experience.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Malik (I) (2021)
8/10
A FILM WHICH IS HEAVY FROM SEVERAL ASPECTS
15 July 2021
Mahesh Narayanan's Malik starring Fahadh Faasil as the protagonist, can be considered as one of the best Indian films that came out this year. The movie starts with a 12-minute single shot scene which is a cinematography textbook and a masterclass in unconventional and non-traditional filmmaking. The camera movement is so smooth and flexible despite having several types of angles and shots such as warping, panning, tracking, trucking, long, close, medium, dolly and random movements.

The director managed to keep a good pace throughout the film but at certain times the viewer may feel slight disconnections from what's on the screen.

The performance of the entire cast is simply stunning except that of one or two actors who doesn't have much importance.

The story is about Ahammadali Suleiman(Fahadh Faasil), a businessman and smuggler who has a certain amount of power in his area - Ramadapally. His area is the home for two religious communities. He ends up facing communalism created by politicians and police officers.

The story shows a total of four periods in a non-linear manner. Only the second, third and fourth periods have the screen presence of Fahadh. The second period shows his youth, the third - his middle age, the fourth shows him as an old person. The performance of Fahadh in second and third periods were good but his acting in the fourth period is the most appreciable. It was something which we have never seen before from Fahadh. The second and third were something usual from him. Overall, Fahadh is successful in transforming him into the character of Ahammadali Suleiman.

But still, the best performer in the film is Nimisha Sajayan and this should be considered as her career best performance.

The screenplay is well-written, especially the dialogues. The way of narration is non-linear and there occured a problem. Non-linearity here, is with the usage of flashbacks, the viewer may find a disconnection when watching the flashbacks and the present events. The entry to the first flashback is written in a cliche manner - narrated by a person to another, and from there the return to the present was written in a similar, unconvincing and dull manner.

Another negative - the Theerame song which was placed in the film was pretty good to hear but it was unnecessary. That song served three purposes - 1. Showcasing the romance and emotional attachment which occured between Roseline and Suleiman 2. Filling up or time lapsing 3. Some gratification to the viewer. Anyway, that song had a tonal, lyrical and vocal beauty. But when it is looked as a part of this film, I don't like to appreciate because the writer-director Mahesh Narayanan should have focused on writing something instead of placing this song.

A factor which played a huge role in elevating the effect which the film can deliver is Sushin Shyam's Background Score which was pulsating and exhilarating.

Overall, the film is definitely worth watching.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bad Genius (2017)
6/10
CINEMA WHICH LOOKS LIKE AN AD.
11 July 2021
The film is entertaining. But it looks so crappy. The lighting is at an unnecessary level - which make it look like a television commercial advertisment. That's maybe because the director's experience is in ad film making.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Robber (I) (2013)
8/10
FILLED WITH ELEGANT VISUALS
11 July 2021
During 1953, Pakhi, an aristocrat's daughter, falls in love with an archaeologist. However, unbeknownst to her, he leads a double life that threatens their relationship.

Vikramaditya Motwane's Lootera is Elegant with its beauty and aesthetics. The first half of the film is glorious with aesthetic frames and music which jumps into the viewer's head. The cinematography excels in composition and framing. The color grading succeeded in creating a vibe. The production design looks marvelous. The performance of Ranveer Singh was good at many times but sometimes you may feel that he is only fit for villainous roles and some other times you may feel that he was a casting mistake. The best performer in this film - Sonakshi Sinha.

An aesthetically pleasing film, recommended!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed