Gone (I) (2012) User Reviews

Where the journey is better than the destination

[bmrao1980 · 7/10 · 23 May 2012]

I saw this one against the critics' recommendation at Rottentomatoes, and it was because of Amanda Seyfred, to be honest. She has those beautiful big blue eyes and blonde hair that one cannot look away from.

But after watching her in this movie, it is clear to me that she is much more than a pretty face, and she can carry a movie on her own.

I can see why the critics would hate it, though. The plot is overly simple, the cops have a cursory role, and none of the characters other than that of Amanda's are well-developed. And, the big 'confrontation' is dealt with as if the director wanted it out of the way as soon as possible.

But, to be honest, in retrospect, the film is about none of that. This is a suspense thriller, not a horror. There does not have to be a big confrontation, and there does not have to be jump shots. This is about the journey of the protagonist against all odds, and how she uses her alertness and her resourcefulness and her charm to get to the person she believes has her sister.

In this, it succeeds. I would watch this one again, and if a movie makes me think that, it has succeeded for me.

Worth seeing - Not the best but FAR from the worst.

[user-322-326156 · 7/10 · 31 May 2012]

I have to admit I wouldn't have seen this movie if my daughter was not in the movie. However, I found it a decent watch. Considering that 85 percent of the films that come out are absurd and complete garbage, this one was decent. It's one of those movies where after you see it you'll think "that was OK/pretty good...but I'm glad ;I didn't pay $10 to see it in the theater". After you view it, you will feel satisfied and there should not be a desire to watch it over & over again - say, like There Will Be Blood. I cant recall any situations in the film that you could consider ridiculous or unbelievable. The movie was filmed on location in Portland, Oregon. So when they are in the setting they say they're in, they're really there. The movie kept me wondering until the end what was going to happen and it didn't end the way I thought it would. I don't want to give anything away as to not ruin your viewing experience. Amanda Seyfried gave a great performance putting in exactly what was required. No extra, unnecessary funny stuff.

I hope this review sets the proper expectation for your viewing experience. Enjoy!

Exceptional Lead Performance

[LeonLouisRicci · 7/10 · 23 June 2013]

A completely focused Performance highlights this somewhat familiar Tale of a Woman who has been severely traumatized by...that is the question. Is it all in her head, is she delusional, did something really happen to her or is she completely "Gone"?

This is played out throughout this competent Thriller as She believes that the source of her pain and suffering is back and has abducted her Sister. This unleashes Her barely pent up Rage and propels Her on an unstoppable quest to evoke Revenge and rescue Her Sis.

This is a bit above a routine exercise in Serial Killer Clichés as it focuses on a truly riveting and believable Amanda Seyfried as the troubled Heroine. Truth is that she is damaged and not really in complete control of her affliction and this lends a certain edginess to the Film as you never really know what She is going to do next, or what Lie She will fabricate, it seems at will, in a moments notice.

Worth a look for Fans of this type of thing and those who like strong Females willing to go the distance even if it means facing your most frightening fears.

A tense thriller that is enjoyable enough for a rainy day.

[JimmyCollins · 7/10 · 25 February 2012]

I think Gone is a film that is pretty much destined for bad reviews, which is a shame because I actually found it quite good, the story is about a girl who was abducted a year ago, but escaped her captor, she goes on living day to day life with the help of mess to deal with the trauma, that is until her captor comes back for her and takes her sister instead, a game of cat and mouse ensues and the viewer is taken on a fast paced cracking thrill ride. Yes there are problems with Gone, for starters the script is slightly underwritten and some story lines are totally forgotten about, particularly some of the story lines surrounding the supporting characters, and it has a bit of a 90's b-grade thriller vibe to it, but for what it's worth it also has a lot of good things about it too. The central performance by Amanda Seyfried is a good one, she is very convincing as the determined heroine of the story, the cinematography is very fitting to the story, the cold and damp setting of Portland is wonderfully captured by the camera, the pace is fast as a bullet, each scene is quick and doesn't drag on and it has some genuinely scary and tense scenes, particularly towards the end.

Some reviews I have read say that Ananda Seyfried deserves better roles, yes she deserves great roles because she is a supremely talented young actress but I really don't see what's so bad about this role, it's a strong female character, I think people may only want to see her in romantic comedies and that's it. Speaking of Ms Seyfried, she gets better and better in every film I see her in, she has a very natural acting style, she never seems forced, everything seems very natural for her, I look forward to seeing where her career goes.

Gone is a real middle ground kind of thriller, it's not a teen slasher and it's not a more mature adult thriller either, it kind of takes what's great about both types and combines them into a highly entertaining movie that will have you guessing tight until the very end. My only criticism is just the abandoned story lines of the supporting characters, I dint know if it's lazy writing or what but for me I felt I was steered in a direction only to be left thinking, but all in all the movie is great, I would definitely watch it again.

Give it a go, I hope you enjoy, Amanda Seyfried is wonderful. :) excellent.

Strong Performance by Seyfried

[FFman-847-460126 · 6/10 · 27 February 2012]

Gone proved to be a much different movie from what the trailer indicated. Under the veil of a cliché game of cat and mouse, Amanda Seyfried pulls of an incredibly difficult role by riding the line between insane and driven. The movie puts its entire success on keeping the audience guessing whether this could "all be in her head" or really is part of a sick plot. It succeeds in doing so on the shoulders of Amanda Seyfried.

Unfortunately, Gone built its own wall on the road to greatness. By keeping you guessing, the writer throws plenty of false hints and possible suspects. By doing so, the movie takes on the feel of the worn-out Hollywood thriller. Although this move may have been necessary, it means other aspects of the plot are seriously lacking. Characters are completely forgotten. The climax relies on a timed event that could not be planed. In the end, this thriller lacks all the elements to make it memorable.

Despite missing its mark, Gone is completely enjoyable. In many movies, I find myself evaluating the movie halfway through. That never happened. The tension maintained itself through the entirety of the movie. I found myself holding my breath, sitting on the edge of my seat, and wanting to scream, "Don't go in there!" This is how a thriller should work. I wish the amateur mistakes could have been removed. If that were done, this movie could have been great.

I must point out the politics of the movie. It was believable on most levels. The movie is set on the basis that a girl who has experience with PychCare will usually be treated like she is insane. This idea is done very well. The investigators do give her the time of day, but still appear to brush her off. As the movie progresses, it is fascinating to watch the investigators grow more worried about Seyfried with a gun rather than a missing girl. In the end, it is quite believable.

If you are in need of a good thriller, this is the movie to see. It stumbles, but will keep you guessing. There is no great advancements made in the genre, but that does not mean it is not worth seeing. When you put an actress in the lead who can keep you guessing, you will usually have a good thriller. Congratulations to Amanda Seyfried for getting out of her shitty movie slump.

reillyreviews.wordpress.com

90 mins of my life are Gone

[Thatguywiththeface · 3/10 · 6 September 2012]

... Just, don't even waste your time. Not even worth the 90 mins it is. It's not terribly bad, but it's terribly bland and predictable. It has a disappointing ending, characters that defy logic, police who have obviously never worked a case or arrested anybody before, and at one point, the ONLY way Amanda Seyfried could have escaped the cops was if she had had tele-porting powers... That actually would've made this movie much more interesting. The acting is actually very good for this type of movie, especially considering the acting ALMOST makes you forget some holes in logic... ALMOST. But like I said, it's not a terribly bad movie. It WILL keep you interested. In fact, with the disappointing ending, that's kind of a downfall for it.

Good Suspense and Tension

[bob-rutzel-1 · 7/10 · 31 May 2012]

Jill's (Amanda Seyfried) sister Molly is kidnapped as Jill was years ago. Detective Powers (Daniel Sunjata) doesn't believe her as he didn't believe her before because Jill could not come up with any viable evidence that she was kidnapped and escaped. He believes it was all in her head. Jill feels she cannot trust the police to help.

At first I thought (and hoped) I would be seeing a female version of a Mel Gibson character who knows no boundaries when a family member is taken. I was wrong. We see Jill doing the detective work that the police would normally do. She goes here and there and gathers clues getting closer and closer to the serial-killer kidnapper. The police are now in full pursuit of her because shots were fired and that is a violation as she had been in a mental hospital and owning a gun is a no no.

This held me because the suspense and tension were very good. And, what's not to like with Jill and those big Red Riding Hood eyes? (I would guess Amanda Seyfried will be forever known for that.) The entire cast performed well.

Two things: Jill's road trip to the forest where she was kept years ago has the story go full circle as we knew it would. We screamed and begged for her not to go there, but she didn't listen. And, where Molly was found was a bit of a stretch but for the twist to work it had to be this way.

However, all in all, this is pretty good even though you are convinced a Mel Gibson character won't show up. (7/10)

Violence: Yes. Sex: No. Nudity; No. Language: No.

Not that great

[kellerz724 · 5/10 · 10 June 2012]

A LOT OF SPOILERS!!! This movie had me going through the whole thing and I thought it was suspenseful (it even woke me up as I had fallen asleep before I started watching it) but the ending ruined this movie- not sure if it was just the ending, but the ending was definitely lame. I even started getting pretty creeped out when character Jill was talking to the murderer on the phone and traveling through the woods to find him, but then the final fight was so disappointing. You know- that final fight between murderer and victim that got away that the entire movie leads up to that is supposed to leave you satisfied, was a total bummer in this movie. The character Jill is abducted a year earlier, gets away after finding other human remains in there, the police don't believe it happened bc of her history and believes she's looney tunes, and her sister goes missing and she believes her abductor took her sister. This girl has to find him on her own what with not having the police on her side, and she has nothing to lose- With how the movie was going, I thought it was going to be a kick ass ending. Nope. There was barely a fight. He threw her in a hole, then she shot him a couple times, climbed out of the hole with the rope he put in there, got info out of him on where her sister was and then lit him on fire. The murderer was a horrible actor, barely put up a fight, and told her, "you said if i told you the truth you wouldn't kill me" Seriously dude? This is not a serial killer with other dead victims. He didn't even put up a fight! There was absolutely nothing exciting about her killing him, nor was he creepy or scary in any way. And I also did not see a point in certain characters- like the cop that told her he was new and wanted to help her- what was the point of him even being in the movie? I thought for sure towards the end that he had something to do with the murders. Nope. I always believe an ending can ruin the whole movie and this one did for me. It's a good thing I rented it cheap from redbox!

Great popcorn movie!

[MisterE2108 · 7/10 · 27 September 2012]

I actually held off from watching this film, I guess because I have a thing against PG or PG 13 films, especially when is comes to horror, or thrillers. But guess what...'Gone' was really a good thriller as well as being a cool little mystery. I never heard of the Director (Heitor Dhalia) until this film and I must say I was quite impressed by the look and style of the film. Dhalia has a great eye, because the scenery in this film was simply breathtaking. A good pace was set and at times I found myself catching my breath due to some tense moments spread throughout the film. I was also impressed by Amanda Seyfried's performance, she held her own and delivered on all aspects of what her character was suppose to give in telling this story. My only grip was Wes Bentley's cop character. Bently's character wasn't really needed and didn't serve no actual purpose, although the film makers lead you to believe his character has some relevance to the story. 'Gone' is not a blockbuster type film, but holds it's own in the tradition of 'Kiss the girls' and other such film thrillers. So when you get a chance to see this film, get yourself, your date, or family a big bowl of popcorn and sit back, because you'll have a nice little viewing experience.

Conventional and Predictable Thriller That Entertains

[claudio_carvalho · 5/10 · 16 June 2013]

The waitress of a dining Jill (Amanda Seyfried) returns early in the morning and does not find her sister Molly (Emily Wickersham) at home. She goes to the police department to report that her sister is missing, but detective Powers (Daniel Sunjata) and his team do not give credit to Jill's words.

Some time ago, Jill claimed that she had been abducted by a stranger and dropped in a hole in the middle of the Forest Park, where she found the corpses of other missing girls. However she succeeded to escape but the investigators did not find any evidence and Jill was sent to a mental institution.

Jill decides to investigate where Molly could be and she brings her revolver for self-protection. When the police discover that she is armed, they begin a manhunt to arrest her. Nobody believes that Molly has been kidnapped and believes that Jill is delusional. Is she?

"Gone" is a conventional and predictable thriller that entertains. The story is developed in a right pace and with the usual clichés (car chases, detectives that do not believe on a victim etc.), but the conclusion is good. My vote is five.

Title (Brazil): "12 Horas" ("12 Hours")

suspense thriller about girl who beats the odds against her

[cekadah · 8/10 · 24 September 2013]

1. there is a review here that is at least 1000 words about how much that person hated this movie. that alone tells me there is more to this flick than the reviewer will admit.

2. as my title above states this is a suspense thriller about a girl who beats the odds against her. these odds are coming from the traditional good (police & doctor) and the bad (abductor). the support group (police & friends) don't believe her story. but she knows better and takes the situation into hand.

3. the suspense is continuous and good enough to keep you guessing what she will do next. yes - some of it is a bit unbelievable. but isn't that the theme of the movie - nobody believes her - not even the movie watcher.

4. ignore the naysayers and check out this thriller --- very kewl ending!

I enjoyed it

[bustedsmile · 7/10 · 6 July 2012]

I watched this film last night and enjoyed it. I found it very thrilling and intense and needed to know the end. A few scenes and story lines didn't seem relevant to me, especially after watching it; I thought to myself "why did they even include that? I don't see the relevance of this to the story at all." In particular Det. Hood; he began to try and get close to the case but that storyline didn't really stick and fizzled out rather quickly.

Looking back, I thought Amanda gave a very strong performance, the strongest I've seen her do.

I recommend watching for yourself before judging!

Stay Gone . . !

[MC1-Bjornson · 4/10 · 24 April 2012]

"Gone", Rated "PG-13" for Adult Situations, Strong Language, Some Violence, Some Disturbing Imagery. Running Time: 1hr.&34mns.

*1/2 (Out of ****)

Amanda Seyfried seems likable enough. She's a talented young actress who's been in supporting roles and is now crossing over into headlining territory. She's got the smarts, acting chops and the good looks to be an engaging actress in the years to come. In my opinion, to a degree, she resembles a young Michelle Pfeiffer.

Having noted these things, I'm still trying to understand what Seyfried was doing in "Gone." No doubt, this film was designed as a vehicle for Ms. Seyfried. I'm sure there will be other roles for her to shine in, but in "Gone" she is wallowing in the mire.

The film opens with the lovely Jill Conway scouring a forest outside of Portland, Oregon. She alleges she was abducted a year earlier by a lunatic who brought her to the woods and placed her in a hole in the ground with human remains: dead women, to be exact. After all this time, she believes this woman-killer is still on the loose. Her deepest fear is he will come looking for her to finish the job he started with her. Jill's sister Molly (Emily Wickersham, "I am Number Four") has moved into Jill's house to keep an eye on Jill. Their relationship is a symbiotic one. Jill has a mounting paranoia about a supposed loony on the prowl and Molly is a recovered alcoholic. Together, they keep each other in check.

After waitressing late one night, Jill returns home to discover her sister has vanished. Molly's disappearance does not jive as she was studying for a test and all her clothes are accounted for except for the night-time garments she was wearing when Jill last saw her. Frantic, Jill searches for her sister. In Jill's mind, there is only one possibility for what happened to Molly: the man who kidnapped Jill a year earlier has returned. Jill believes he kidnapped Molly with the intent of killing her as revenge for Jill escaping from him. Now, I realize the movies are generally tall tales to begin with, but for the lunatic to plan over a year to get back at Jill, the one girl to have gotten away, seems an overly ludicrous conclusion for Jill to arrive at. But I digress.

There are the obvious questions about this film's set-up. Why wasn't the killer ever brought in? Why wasn't the hole in the woods with the human remains ever discovered? Why haven't the police found anything to support Jill's claims? What is Jill's next move? The partial answer to these questions is somewhat "Hitchcockian": Jill previously spent some time in a psyche ward. Oh. This hinders Jill's credibility as the victim of a mad-man. The police doubt he was real at all. What about the hole in ground? What hole in the ground? The police were never able to find it. Oh.

"Gone" works on the premise that all cops are stupid, unbelieving and inept to do their jobs. We are introduced to three of them: Lt. Bozeman (Michael Pare, "Leverage") who is authoritative and easily agitated (sounds like my high school study hall teacher) ; Detective Lonsdale (Katherine Moenning, "The L Word") who looks about as bored as this movie's audience (at least she looks sharp in her leather coat and messy straw-like hair) ; and the sympathetic Detective Peter Hood (Wes Bentley, "The Hunger Games") who looks like he belongs in a "creepy guy" edition of GQ. Given Jill's past, the police all believe she is crazy. Jill came in on a Friday with her complaint, but as far as they are concerned it can keep until Monday. Feeling that nobody can be trusted, Jill sets out to find her sister and confront the crazed stalker for once and for all. Hmmm…

If it wasn't for Amanda Seyfried's charm and good looks, I could not imagine how anybody could make it through this movie. The dialog is horrendous, the situation is preposterous and there are a lot of wasted opportunities with the story. Here's an example of a wasted opportunity: We know why the police don't believe Jill's story. Wouldn't it have been interesting if Jill herself had doubt on her own story? What if she questioned if the events of the previous year had happened at all or if the events only took place in her head? The filmmakers don't even go there. Here is a chance to keep the audience guessing if the threat is even real or imagined. This is just one of many ideas totally blown.

If you're concerned about spoilers, read no further . . .

How about the killer? I couldn't help but wonder about this guy. What motivates him to do what he does? Why didn't the police ever find any physical evidence on this guy? Didn't anyone else in Portland think it was just a little weird that all these women disappeared? Was anybody looking for them? Surely you can't have a pile of decaying women in a hole in the woods without someone asking questions about their whereabouts. I also found it hard to believe the killer would be a homeless guy who did his handiwork out in the woodland. How could he have had any income to buy materials for his crimes and rent vehicles? The movie doesn't tell you. This guy has no other purpose than to drive the story. There is absolutely no depth to him and there is no real sense of danger either. Heck, just to have said he was the boogeyman would have been at least something.

"Gone" is completely devoid of any real emotion, plausibility and suspense which are the keystones to any effective thriller. If you were to fall asleep at the movies and miss a movie completely, this would be the one to sleep through.

Excellent 90 Minute Thriller

[Erbland · 7/10 · 6 March 2012]

Before going to see this movie I had read some really bad reviews. After seeing it, I can't understand why. I thought the movie was an enjoyable thriller. I thought Amanda Seyfried did great in her role. This was again in contrast to some of the reviews I had read. As far as I am concerned, if you want an excellent thriller that will provide 90 minutes or so of escapism, "Gone" will more than fill the bill. The single scene that 'annoyed' me a bit was a product placement for Aquafina water. A large bottle of Aquafina was on a nightstand in a bedroom. It seemed so out of place that it was an obvious paid placement.

Amanda's great

[SnoopyStyle · 7/10 · 29 August 2013]

Jill Conway (Amanda Seyfried) was kidnapped and escaped but nobody believed her. She was sent to a psychiatric facility. Her sister Molly disappears and she is convinced that it's the same kidnapper from two years earlier.

The production value is limited but the tension is maintained throughout this film. Basically, this is a damsel alone in danger against a serial killer. Amanda is great. The production does dip into more TV level of style at times. A bigger budget would help as well as a more imaginative eye. I'm not sure if there are any unfilled plot holes and the climax definitely needed more action. It's still a good watch mostly for Amanda.

What a twist at the end

[dtucker86 · 24 February 2012]

Watching movies like this makes me think that Hollywood may be running out of original ideas. The story of an innocent person being pursued is as old as movies itself, an innocent person trying to solve the crime on their own while the incompetent police fall all over themselves (as they do in this film) is also old hat. However, Amanda Seyfried gives a great performance as the spunky heroine determined to find her sister. The situation she escaped from is similar to Ashley Judd's in Kiss The Girls. There are some genuine moments of suspense here, especially in the end out in the woods. SPOILER ALERT the twist sort of caught me by surprise (read backwards) along all house their under buried well and alive was Molly. I love the fact that the bad guy really got his just desserts as well.

So bad I created a account on here to warn people

[kaml1993 · 1/10 · 4 August 2012]

This movie was just pure awful. The overall performance of the actress was great given the nature of the script and the character. But the story was just plain awful and so were the characters. All the main character did was being a paranoid annoying brat, throughout the entire movie that pointed a gun at everyone who asked questions. And don't get me started on the climax of the movie, as it was the pinnacle of stupidity. With every minute that i watched that movie i wondered more and more how the main character hasn't died yet with all the bad decisions she makes.

So overall, a great actress but a bombed script.

A movie that was good, but was an extra element away from being really good. Seyfried is a great choice for this though. I say B

[cosmo_tiger · 6/10 · 22 May 2012]

"He's back! He came back for me, broke into my house and took my sister because I wasn't there." When Jill (Seyfried) comes home from work to help her sister study she finds her missing. Convinced that the man that took her a few years ago has returned she goes to the cops. When they don't believe her she decides to track him down herself. This is another movie I had high expectations for based on the preview. This is not really an original idea but still seemed interesting. Amanda Seyfried was believable in this movie as a paranoid victim trying to prove she is right. The movie is tense in parts and frustrating in others and keeps you guessing all the way to the end. There was just something missing in this to make it really good. The plot is simple, almost too simple for a main stream movie like this one. This would have been a really good "Without A Trace" show or a "48 Hours Mystery" hour show though. It's still worth a watch. Overall, a good movie that could have been better if it added an extra element. Maybe a better ending would have also helped. I give it a B.

Action Thriller featuring Amanda S.

[amloranger · 2/10 · 4 April 2012]

Honestly I expected so much more from this movie. Yes, I sat and watched the painstaking hour and a half, but I must stress that I was thoroughly disappointed at the end of the movie. I was hoping for something that would at the very least get my blood rushing and instead I was left with a half rate action thriller (if you could call it that). Where was the ending? It was as though a writer had a superb idea for a movie and then got took drunk to finish the script. There's at least 10 pages left at the end of the movie that were lost on the way home from that Hollywood bar. Regardless Amanda did a good job with what she had, I just wish, for her sake, that they could have brought this one home. I would rather watch Criminal Minds.

Amanda Seyfried shines in this solid thriller.

[Sleepin_Dragon · 7/10 · 6 April 2019]

Amanda Seyfried shines in this fairly generic, run of the mill pot boiler. The story itself is decent, but has been done to death, however Seyfried has enough charisma, and enough presence to drive it forward.

Sadly for Seyfried, some of the acting is a little wooden in parts from some of the supporting members, but I feel she has enough presence.

The editing isn't what I'd class as sharp or particularly that good, in fact I thought the production values made the film look a little cheap.

A really enjoyable thriller. Way better then expected. 7/10

Great build up! STUPID ENDING!!!

[bronzesrv · 5/10 · 2 June 2022]

Great build up! STUPID ENDING! Sickening character! As tempting as it is, you just don't show up anywhere waving your gun around in strangers faces, Breaking into their stores and bum rushing teenagers,especially when they are trying to help you. By the time the ending came I didn't give a damn anymore! The main character was truly stupid. And the cops were on a whole nother level of stupid ! 30 cops couldn't catch one chick waving a gun and on two high speed chases ! Dumb! Dumb! Just dumb!

Better than expected, Gone lets us take chase with a chameleon in search of the last piece of an abduction puzzle.

[thebestatwhathedoes · 8/10 · 4 June 2012]

This movie was well paced and well acted by Seyfried. I really enjoyed the "road trip" she takes trying to track down her target. She is slick in her conversations and smooth in her charms to converse with people and get whatever puzzle pieces they have to offer. I really like the mystery the movie conveys as it leads to the end. I really felt like the path could have lead to multiple characters in the story, and as you watch Seyfried's pace you are constantly asking yourself how much of the story is she capable of creating herself. I hope the score for this movie rises about the 5.6 it is at currently. Other movies float in this range and do not bring nearly as much to the table.

Entertaining young adult thriller

[davispittman · 7/10 · 6 February 2018]

Gone is a movie that has a good many hits and a few misses. Amanda Seyfried is one of the film's hits, she really gives a skillful performance as the lead. She plays a tough as nails, no nonsense, heroine that will stop at nothing to save her sister from the same thing she went through. The big question that everyone is asking is: did Amanda's character just imagine that she was kidnapped or did it really happen and is her sister suffering the same fate? The writing is overall pretty good, could have been better in some places, but overall it's good. The action is average, still well done, but it's the same kind of stuff you'll see in many other films of this genre. Something that I really liked was the dialogue, especially between two characters in particular, won't say who because of potential spoilers. I suggest this film due to it's anxiety inducing thrills and the strong lead performance by Seyfried. 7/10 for Gone (2012).

See at your own risk

[ron-fernandez-pittsburgh · 2/10 · 12 July 2012]

While GONE has an interesting concept, it fails to deliver. Too many coincidental things happen in ONE DAY. No way could all this happen, no matter how determined the 'damsel in distress' wants to be. Many strange characters and red-herrings don't help. The acting is as good as it can be under the circumstances. Poor dialog makes for very difficult characterizations. Reminds me of TAKEN, and implausible as that was, I had a better time watching it. My advise: Rent something else. Or better yet, rent some really good thrillers that are out there with better writing, editing and more plausible situations. See this one at your own risk. And I hope that the actor WESS BENTLEY get better roles in the future.

Entertain us that's all we ask!

[Sherazade · 7/10 · 26 July 2012]

Two things:

1. Amanda Seyfried proved with this that she can carry a film, she's like Dakota Fanning meets Kate Winslet.

2. In this day and age where nearly every suspenseful theory has already been explored by now this movie managed to keep me guessing.

I have to say, I suspected every single male character just to be on the safe side (I do that whenever I come across characters that all seem shifty) and never doubted for a second that Jill (Seyfried) was telling the truth. Wes Bentley is just a creepy guy and casting him as a creepy cop just upped the ante. This film about a girl who escapes (and is probably the only survivor of) a serial killer's den is thoroughly entertaining without getting too ahead of itself. Great script, great cast and great acting.